Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ASNodeController+Beta] Provide an option to allow nodes to own their controllers. #61

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 1, 2017

Conversation

appleguy
Copy link
Member

We should certainly remove this before moving ASNodeController out of Beta. However, I think
it will require at least ASCollectionNode to be able to retain its top level set of node controllers.

Without this facility built in, it's very difficult for apps supporting both UIKit and ASDK to
manually manage the controllers and keep them in sync with perfect timing.

… controllers.

We should certainly remove this before moving ASNodeController out of Beta. However, I think
it will require at least ASCollectionNode to be able to retain its top level set of node controllers.

Without this facility built in, it's very difficult for apps supporting both UIKit and ASDK to
manually manage the controllers and keep them in sync with perfect timing.
@appleguy appleguy self-assigned this Apr 23, 2017
@garrettmoon
Copy link
Member

Sorry I'm bad at shell scripts so the build failure didn't get reported:


 -> Texture (2.3)
    - WARN  | [Texture/Core, Texture/PINRemoteImage, Texture/IGListKit, and more...] xcodebuild:  /usr/local/var/buildkite-agent/builds/BuildKites-Mac.local-1/pinterest/texture/Source/ASNodeController+Beta.m:49:13: warning: assigning retained object to weak property; object will be released after assignment [-Warc-unsafe-retained-assign]
 
[!] Texture did not pass validation, due to 1 warning (but you can use `--allow-warnings` to ignore it).
[!] The validator for Swift projects uses Swift 3.0 by default, if you are using a different version of swift you can use a `.swift-version` file to set the version for your Pod. For example to use Swift 2.3, run: 
    `echo "2.3" > .swift-version`.
You can use the `--no-clean` option to inspect any issue.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 27, 2017

🚫 CI failed with log

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 27, 2017

1 Warning
⚠️ Any source code changes should have an entry in CHANGELOG.md or have #trivial in their title.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

@appleguy
Copy link
Member Author

This is ready for review when folks have a chance. Not at all urgent.

It would be great to not need this diff if changes are planned soon to make it unnecessary. However, I think it's perfectly fine if this is not on the priority list for the core team - thus this diff so that there's a good option for clients to work around in the meantime.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants