Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the container configurable via env variable; update documentation #2

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mag1024
Copy link

@mag1024 mag1024 commented Oct 19, 2022

Made some changes to allow the container to be configured without rebuilding -- this might eventually allow an image to get published to a registry.
Also expanded the documentation by attempting to explain how this container works.

@mag1024
Copy link
Author

mag1024 commented Oct 20, 2022

I ended up making quite a few more changes, including dropping the separate copy of mdns-repeater.c entirely in favor of basing the image directly on containers shipped by monstrenyatko/docker-mdns-repeater, and creating some Dockerhub images of our own. Please let me know what you think the best way to reconcile this would be. I'm open to merging this back wholesale, or spinning this fork out.

Last but not least, thanks for your work, and I'm looking forward to your pcapless repeater :))

@TheMickeyMike
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for PR! I will look at it by the end of the week

README.md Outdated
@@ -1,82 +1,69 @@
# docker-mdns-repeater-mikrotik
mdns-repeater in mikrotik container
An mDNS repeater that can ran as a container on Mikrotik routers.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
An mDNS repeater that can ran as a container on Mikrotik routers.
An mDNS repeater that can run as a container on Mikrotik routers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants