Skip to content

EC-CUBE Improper access control vulnerability

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 24, 2022 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Apr 25, 2024

Package

composer ec-cube/ec-cube (Composer)

Affected versions

> 4.0.5-p1, < 4.0.6-p1

Patched versions

4.0.6-p1

Description

Improper access control vulnerability in EC-CUBE 4.0.6 (EC-CUBE 4 series) allows a remote attacker to bypass access restriction and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 1, 2021
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 24, 2022
Reviewed Apr 25, 2024
Last updated Apr 25, 2024

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

0.326%
(71st percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2021-20778

GHSA ID

GHSA-4cxm-8hh5-jj33

Source code

Loading Checking history
Improvements are not currently accepted on this advisory because it uses an unsupported versioning operator. Read more and discuss here.