Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade bq libraries #7264

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 26, 2021
Merged

upgrade bq libraries #7264

merged 2 commits into from
May 26, 2021

Conversation

kcibul
Copy link
Contributor

@kcibul kcibul commented May 19, 2021

Suggested by Micah @ Google, see broadinstitute/dsp-spec-ops#309

.setTableId(tableRef.tableName)
.build();
final String srcTable =
String.format(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are there no longer tableReference objects, just table objects? Doing this with a builder pattern feels cleaner

@kcibul kcibul merged commit 13aa5cf into ah_var_store May 26, 2021
@kcibul kcibul deleted the kc_bq_upgrade2 branch May 26, 2021 13:50
Copy link
Contributor

@ahaessly ahaessly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just one suggestion

@@ -22,11 +27,9 @@

private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(StorageAPIAvroReader.class);

private static int rowCount = 0;
private BigQueryReadClient client;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

now that google renamed storageAPI to ReadAPI, should we rename this class? not super important.

This was referenced Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants