Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

read api bytes logging, upgrade bigquery client versions #7601

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 17, 2021

Conversation

kcibul
Copy link
Contributor

@kcibul kcibul commented Dec 13, 2021

The main purpose of this PR was to output the new estimated bytes read from the Read API for better monitoring and debugging.

However in the course of that I discovered that we were using ancient versions of the google APIs. No massive improvements from the release logs, but a lot of nice features (cleaner logging, automatic retries for certain errors, )

bigQuery 1.131.1 -> 2.3.3 Release log for bigQuery

bigQueryStorage 1.22.3 -> 2.5.0 Release log for bigQueryStorage


import io.netty.util.internal.StringUtil;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this change needed? or is it part of one of the upgrades?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We were importing the "shaded" version of this before which isn't really the library, but gradle's repackaging of it and it's not stable. This is the public version.

Copy link

@rsasch rsasch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM — are you planning to build a jar after this is merged so we can start to use it for beta, or is this a post-beta thing?

@kcibul kcibul merged commit ff251d6 into ah_var_store Dec 17, 2021
@kcibul kcibul deleted the kc_log_readbytes branch December 17, 2021 16:46
This was referenced Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants