Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default extract scatter width [VS-415] #7878

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 8, 2022

Conversation

mcovarr
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcovarr mcovarr commented May 31, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 31, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (ah_var_store@00e7d57). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             ah_var_store     #7878   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                ?   86.290%           
  Complexity              ?     35195           
================================================
  Files                   ?      2170           
  Lines                   ?    164888           
  Branches                ?     17785           
================================================
  Hits                    ?    142282           
  Misses                  ?     16281           
  Partials                ?      6325           

Copy link

@rsasch rsasch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, except it failed GvsQuickstartIntegration because the truth VCFs hadn't been updated 😞 : https://job-manager.dsde-prod.broadinstitute.org/jobs/7f4b71b4-03a0-4648-aee5-4fc5c3ea575c

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ workflow GvsExtractCallset {
String extract_table_prefix
String filter_set_name
String query_project = project_id
Int scatter_count
Int? scatter_count
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we want to provide a comment that no default is needed since it is calculated now during the workflow

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure I could do that here.

@mcovarr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mcovarr commented Jun 6, 2022

Now integration tested successfully here.

@mcovarr mcovarr requested a review from rsasch June 6, 2022 15:40
@mcovarr mcovarr merged commit b48282e into ah_var_store Jun 8, 2022
@mcovarr mcovarr deleted the vs_415_default_extract_scatter_width branch June 8, 2022 20:19
This was referenced Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants