Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Populate cost metadata for GATK tasks. #7919

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Jul 8, 2022

Conversation

gbggrant
Copy link
Collaborator

@gbggrant gbggrant commented Jun 27, 2022

Populates cost_metadata table for two gatk tasks

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (ah_var_store@4b2cf4b). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head cb38cde differs from pull request most recent head 4710dfe. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4710dfe to get more accurate results

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             ah_var_store     #7919   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                ?   16.934%           
  Complexity              ?      4702           
================================================
  Files                   ?      1375           
  Lines                   ?     82064           
  Branches                ?     13014           
================================================
  Hits                    ?     13897           
  Misses                  ?     66106           
  Partials                ?      2061           

@gbggrant gbggrant marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2022 16:27
@gbggrant
Copy link
Collaborator Author

--call-set-identifier ~{call_set_identifier} \
--wdl-step GvsCreateFilterSet \
--wdl-call ExtractFilterTask \
--shard-identifier ~{intervals_name}
>>>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fully out of the scope of this pr, but we have so many params! I wonder if we could cut down on a lot of the fq ones--like would we ever not know what the alt-allele-table was called if we have the proj and dataset?

@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ workflow GvsQuickstartIntegration {

call Unified.GvsUnified {
input:
call_set_identifier = branch_name,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice!

builder.addFields(
TableFieldSchema.newBuilder().setName("call_set_identifier").setType(TableFieldSchema.Type.STRING).setMode(TableFieldSchema.Mode.REQUIRED).build()
);
builder.addFields(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does the newBuilder need to be instantiated for each col? Or can you make the builder with all the cols?

@rsasch
Copy link

rsasch commented Jun 29, 2022

Is there a way you can use/update the GvsQuickstartIntegration.AssertCostIsTrackedAndExpected task to check for these additional tracked costs?

Copy link

@rsasch rsasch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍🏻

@gbggrant gbggrant merged commit faf3347 into ah_var_store Jul 8, 2022
@gbggrant gbggrant deleted the gg_VS-479_gatk_cost_to_metadata branch July 8, 2022 02:35
This was referenced Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants