Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GVS / Hail VDS integration test [VS-639] #8086

Merged
merged 49 commits into from
Nov 10, 2022

Conversation

mcovarr
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcovarr mcovarr commented Nov 7, 2022

This ticket was intended as a spike but in the process of spiking I was able to create a peer Hail VDS integration test to the VCF integration test. This seems like a viable candidate for Q4 MVP so putting it out for review as is.

This creates a separate integration test for AoU Delta-style Hail VDS outputs with a tieout to regular GVS VCFs. The existing GvsQuickstartIntegration WDL has become an "uber" integration WDL that by default runs both the VCF and Hail VDS integration tests, but these can be toggled on or off separately with optional boolean inputs.

@mcovarr mcovarr requested review from gbggrant, rsasch, koncheto-broad and RoriCremer and removed request for gbggrant November 7, 2022 15:11
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (ah_var_store@d1907a8). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 308c703 differs from pull request most recent head bd65357. Consider uploading reports for the commit bd65357 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             ah_var_store     #8086   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                ?   86.240%           
  Complexity              ?     35200           
================================================
  Files                   ?      2173           
  Lines                   ?    165041           
  Branches                ?     17794           
================================================
  Hits                    ?    142331           
  Misses                  ?     16382           
  Partials                ?      6328           


script_url_prefix="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/broadinstitute/gatk/~{branch_name}/scripts/variantstore/wdl/extract"

for script in hail_gvs_import.py hail_join_vds_vcfs.py gvs_vds_tie_out.py
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is clever, but it might be worth adding a comment somewhere about why we are doing this?

RGQ: int32
}
'vds_entry': struct {
LGT: call,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dont we also have a GT in the VDS? isn't that what messed us up? or do we need to drop it?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually this appears to be correct as is.

@mcovarr mcovarr merged commit aa97a09 into ah_var_store Nov 10, 2022
@mcovarr mcovarr deleted the vs_639_hail_testing_spike branch November 10, 2022 20:56
This was referenced Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants