Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disentangle non-GVS code from GVS code [VS-834] #8229

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 3, 2023

Conversation

mcovarr
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcovarr mcovarr commented Mar 1, 2023

More prep work for separating GVS code: remove references to GVS code from non-GVS code. Integration test currently running here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 1, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (ah_var_store@6d41adf). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             ah_var_store     #8229   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                ?   83.987%           
  Complexity              ?     34800           
================================================
  Files                   ?      2194           
  Lines                   ?    167016           
  Branches                ?     18003           
================================================
  Hits                    ?    140271           
  Misses                  ?     20518           
  Partials                ?      6227           

@gatk-bot
Copy link

gatk-bot commented Mar 2, 2023

Github actions tests reported job failures from actions build 4309218748
Failures in the following jobs:

Test Type JDK Job ID Logs
cloud 8 4309218748.10 logs
cloud 11 4309218748.11 logs
variantcalling 8 4309218748.2 logs
conda 8 4309218748.3 logs
unit 8 4309218748.1 logs

@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ public static VCFFormatHeaderLine getEquivalentFormatHeaderLine(final String inf
addFilterLine(new VCFFilterHeaderLine(VCFConstants.PASSES_FILTERS_v4, "Site contains at least one allele that passes filters"));

addFilterLine(new VCFFilterHeaderLine(NAY_FROM_YNG, "Considered a NAY in the Yay, Nay, Grey table"));
addFilterLine(new VCFFilterHeaderLine(EXCESS_ALLELES,"Site has an excess of alternate alleles based on the input threshold (default is " + CommonCode.EXCESS_ALLELES_THRESHOLD + ")"));
addFilterLine(new VCFFilterHeaderLine(EXCESS_ALLELES,"Site has an excess of alternate alleles based on the input threshold"));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did the info about the default go away?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mcovarr mcovarr Mar 2, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! 😄 Because this code is in a non-GVS package and it was reaching into a GVS package to grab that. There could be other, better ways of solving this problem.

Copy link

@koncheto-broad koncheto-broad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mcovarr mcovarr merged commit 3a7f6e2 into ah_var_store Mar 3, 2023
@mcovarr mcovarr deleted the vs_834_disentangle branch March 3, 2023 19:18
This was referenced Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants