Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VS-917. Update override jar in GvsJointCalling wdl to fix support issue. #8312

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 11, 2023

Conversation

gbggrant
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@gbggrant gbggrant changed the title Update override jar in GvsJointCalling wdl to fix support issue. VS-917. Update override jar in GvsJointCalling wdl to fix support issue. May 11, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (ah_var_store@928ffe9). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             ah_var_store     #8312   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                ?   86.193%           
  Complexity              ?     35520           
================================================
  Files                   ?      2192           
  Lines                   ?    166470           
  Branches                ?     17918           
================================================
  Hits                    ?    143485           
  Misses                  ?     16600           
  Partials                ?      6385           

Copy link
Collaborator

@mcovarr mcovarr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gbggrant
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Passing GvsJointVariantCalling workflow here

@gbggrant gbggrant merged commit 6a0b1a4 into ah_var_store May 11, 2023
@gbggrant gbggrant deleted the gg_UpdateJointCallingOverrideJar branch May 11, 2023 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants