Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix creation of mock binaries during unit tests #375

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

creativeprojects
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The overarching theme of these changes focuses on enhancing test setups, improving test robustness, and ensuring better cross-platform functionality. Significant adjustments include removing OS-specific initializations, increasing sleep times, building and handling mock binaries dynamically, enabling parallel execution of tests, and updating error handling and command compositions. This facilitates more efficient and reliable testing across different environments.

Changes

File Path Summary
integration_test.go Removed OS-specific echoBinary initializations; utilised platform.IsWindows().
lock/lock_test.go Modified build command; increased sleep time in two tests.
main_test.go Added functionality to build and execute mock binaries for tests; introduced clean-up.
shell/command_test.go Overhauled test functions; added test parallelisation, improved command handling.
sleep_test.go Added t.Parallel() to enable parallel test executions.
wrapper_test.go Removed os/exec import and mockBinary initialisation.
schedule_jobs_test.go Added t.Parallel() to various test functions for concurrent execution.
update_test.go Added comment explaining why parallel execution isn’t feasible.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.53%. Comparing base (854f6c9) to head (f4b298c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #375   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.53%   71.53%           
=======================================
  Files         121      121           
  Lines       12744    12744           
=======================================
  Hits         9116     9116           
  Misses       3219     3219           
  Partials      409      409           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 71.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
shell/command_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1099-1099: Ineffectual assignments to sleep should be reviewed.

The variable sleep is assigned values in several places, but these assignments are ineffectual and do not impact the program's behavior. This could lead to confusion and should be either used effectively or removed.

- sleep = constants.MinResticLockRetryDelay
+ // Correctly use or remove the assignment to `sleep`.

Also applies to: 1104-1104, 1110-1110

wrapper_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1099-1099: Ineffectual assignments to sleep should be reviewed.

The variable sleep is assigned values in several places, but these assignments are ineffectual and do not impact the program's behavior. This could lead to confusion and should be either used effectively or removed.

- sleep = constants.MinResticLockRetryDelay
+ // Correctly use or remove the assignment to `sleep`.

Also applies to: 1104-1104, 1110-1110

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 854f6c9 and 25e3d84.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • integration_test.go (3 hunks)
  • lock/lock_test.go (3 hunks)
  • main_test.go (1 hunks)
  • shell/command_test.go (24 hunks)
  • sleep_test.go (1 hunks)
  • wrapper_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • integration_test.go
  • lock/lock_test.go
  • sleep_test.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
wrapper_test.go

1099-1099: ineffectual assignment to sleep

(ineffassign)


1104-1104: ineffectual assignment to sleep

(ineffassign)


1110-1110: ineffectual assignment to sleep

(ineffassign)

Additional comments not posted (4)
main_test.go (2)

18-21: Global variables for mock binaries are introduced.

The addition of mockBinary and echoBinary as global variables allows for easier management and reuse across different test functions, which is a good practice for avoiding redundancy and improving maintainability.


23-45: Refactor in TestMain to manage mock binaries.

The refactoring in TestMain to include building and managing mock binaries improves the setup for tests, ensuring that all necessary binaries are available before tests run and are cleaned up afterwards. This is crucial for preventing side effects between tests and for proper resource management.
[APROVED]

shell/command_test.go (2)

27-37: Refactored TestMain for building mock binary.

The refactoring in TestMain to manage the building of a mock binary is appropriate for setting up the test environment. The error handling and cleanup process is well-handled, ensuring that resources are properly managed.


41-41: Use of t.Parallel() to improve test efficiency.

The addition of t.Parallel() in multiple test functions is a good practice to improve test execution time by allowing tests to run concurrently. This is especially useful in a large test suite where execution time can become significant.

Also applies to: 61-61, 103-103, 130-130, 225-225, 265-265, 277-277, 287-287, 307-307, 327-327, 341-341, 361-361, 395-395, 411-411, 432-432, 456-456, 481-481, 499-499, 518-518, 531-531, 545-545, 573-573, 592-592

main_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25e3d84 and f4b298c.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • schedule_jobs_test.go (12 hunks)
  • update_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • schedule_jobs_test.go
  • update_test.go

@creativeprojects creativeprojects merged commit a615444 into master Jun 28, 2024
8 checks passed
@creativeprojects creativeprojects deleted the fix-unit-tests branch June 28, 2024 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant