Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency @testing-library/jest-dom to v6 #471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@testing-library/jest-dom ^5.16.5 -> ^6.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

testing-library/jest-dom (@​testing-library/jest-dom)

v6.4.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Remove errant export of GetByRoleMatcher, fixing type checking in some TS configurations (#​575) (a93c0c4)

v6.4.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Export type TestingLibraryMatchers from "./matchers" (#​576) (dd1c4dd)

v6.4.0

Compare Source

Features

v6.3.0

Compare Source

Features

v6.2.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Standalone types for "./matchers" export and add Bun support (#​566) (5675b86)

v6.2.0

Compare Source

Features
  • toHaveAccessibleDescription supports aria-description (#​565) (1fb156c)

v6.1.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • upgrade @adobe/css-tools to 4.3.1 to address vulnerability (#​532) (44f1eab)

v6.1.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.0

Compare Source

Features

v6.0.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • matchers type is making the global expect unsafe (#​513) (bdb34f1)

v6.0.0

Compare Source

Features
BREAKING CHANGES
  • Removes the extend-expect script. Users should use
    the default import path or one of the new test platform-specific
    paths to automatically extend the appropriate "expect" instance.

extend-expect was not documented in the Readme, so this change should
have minimal impact.

Users can now use the following import paths to automatically extend
"expect" for their chosen test platform:

For example:

import '@​testing-library/jest-dom/jest-globals'

Importing from one of the above paths will augment the appropriate
matcher interface for the given test platform, assuming the import
is done in a .ts file that is included in the user's tsconfig.json.

It's also (still) possible to import the matchers directly without
side effects:

import * as matchers from '@​testing-library/jest-dom/matchers'

  • Update kcd-scripts
  • Drop node < 14

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday" in timezone UTC, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot added the maintenance Housekeeping label Apr 17, 2024
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) April 17, 2024 02:04
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-testing-library-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from afa9e38 to 00e69f0 Compare April 22, 2024 04:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-testing-library-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 58a25b5 to 6e4b30f Compare May 1, 2024 04:25
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-testing-library-monorepo branch from 6e4b30f to 1f95c71 Compare May 1, 2024 06:13
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented May 1, 2024

⚠ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: package-lock.json
npm error code ERESOLVE
npm error ERESOLVE unable to resolve dependency tree
npm error
npm error While resolving: @croct/[email protected]
npm error Found: [email protected]
npm error node_modules/eslint
npm error   dev eslint@"^9.0.0" from the root project
npm error   peer eslint@">= 8" from @croct/[email protected]
npm error   node_modules/@croct/eslint-plugin
npm error     dev @croct/eslint-plugin@"^0.7.0" from the root project
npm error
npm error Could not resolve dependency:
npm error peer eslint@"^8.56.0" from @typescript-eslint/[email protected]
npm error node_modules/@typescript-eslint/parser
npm error   dev @typescript-eslint/parser@"^7.0.0" from the root project
npm error   peer @typescript-eslint/parser@">= 6" from @croct/[email protected]
npm error   node_modules/@croct/eslint-plugin
npm error     dev @croct/eslint-plugin@"^0.7.0" from the root project
npm error
npm error Fix the upstream dependency conflict, or retry
npm error this command with --force or --legacy-peer-deps
npm error to accept an incorrect (and potentially broken) dependency resolution.
npm error
npm error
npm error For a full report see:
npm error /tmp/renovate/cache/others/npm/_logs/2024-05-01T06_13_11_612Z-eresolve-report.txt

npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /tmp/renovate/cache/others/npm/_logs/2024-05-01T06_13_11_612Z-debug-0.log

@renovate renovate bot merged commit b8d12ee into master May 1, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/major-testing-library-monorepo branch May 1, 2024 06:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance Housekeeping
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants