Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test UDS Core on EKS 1.30 #587

Closed
ntwkninja opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #605
Closed

Test UDS Core on EKS 1.30 #587

ntwkninja opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #605
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@ntwkninja
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Delivery environment in currently on 1.29. We'd like to go to 1.30 with some confidence.

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Given a the EKS test in this repo
  • When is ran
  • Then a more supported version of k8s is utilized

Additional context

Current EKS testing is on 1.27

@ntwkninja ntwkninja added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 18, 2024
@mjnagel
Copy link
Contributor

mjnagel commented Jul 18, 2024

Related to #327

@MxNxPx MxNxPx self-assigned this Jul 18, 2024
@mjnagel mjnagel added this to the 0.25.0 milestone Jul 22, 2024
MxNxPx added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 24, 2024
## Description

Update EKS version to 1.29 for 

## Related Issue

Relates to #587

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Other (security config, docs update, etc)

## Checklist before merging

- [ ] Test, docs, adr added or updated as needed
- [ ] [Contributor
Guide](https://github.com/defenseunicorns/uds-template-capability/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
followed
@MxNxPx MxNxPx closed this as completed in 3b961f2 Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants