Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add account: "The given url does not seems to work" #65

Open
afc54 opened this issue Oct 22, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

Add account: "The given url does not seems to work" #65

afc54 opened this issue Oct 22, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@afc54
Copy link

afc54 commented Oct 22, 2022

Shaarli running on my own freedombox (https://freedombox.org/). It works fine (as far as I can tell). I can connect to it from multiple computers (via browser). Installed shaarlier from F-droid on my phone (galaxy S6, Android 7) and when adding account I get the above message. I have tried with http, https. To log in from computers the freedombox shaarli uses user name and password. I have entered those into the proper (deprecated) shaarlier fields, but it makes no difference. I have even disabled certificate validation but it makes no difference. The freedombox uses a self-signed certificate. Incidentally, the proper spelling for the error message is "The given url does not seem to work" (no S at the end of seem).

@noccio
Copy link

noccio commented Nov 6, 2022

The same problem with a yunohost installation

@Pupo1
Copy link

Pupo1 commented Dec 16, 2022

I have the same problem on a Debian 11 installation with Apache server. I have a letsencrypt certificate. I don't know where the log file is, so I can't see anything about the exact error.

@kpgmr72
Copy link

kpgmr72 commented Feb 27, 2023

Shaarlier does not appear to connect correctly with Shaarli version 12. My installation worked fine until tonight when I finished upgrading shaarli from 8.4 to 12. Let me know what logs I can collect and I'll do what I can to help figure this bug/issue out.

The example below was run from the public demo instance of Shaarli.

Screenshot_20230227_080308_Shaarlier.jpg

@jimmyppi
Copy link

It works when using API key instead of username/password, see #56

@Pupo1
Copy link

Pupo1 commented Aug 26, 2023 via email

@jimmyppi
Copy link

@Pupo1 so you still get "the given url does not seem to work" when using API key instead of username/password?

@Pupo1
Copy link

Pupo1 commented Aug 27, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants