Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Windows builds with AppVeyor #141

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Jun 8, 2017

Conversation

wilzbach
Copy link
Member

A first experiment with enabling a CI for windows. Ideally should be enabled for all repos.
AppVeyor supports cronjobs as well.
This could be made faster if we run the x86 and x86_64 tests in one run, but then the main overview table would be less informative (I am fine with both ways).

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member Author

Wohoo 🎉
My tests on my fork (to avoid spamming with rebases) have worked:

image

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member Author

So do we go with testing on Windows?
If wanted we can always execute the build.bat (if existent for a repo) as well.
@rikkimax this might be a good starting point to automatically generate the binary executables for Windows.
After the build has succeeded you could let AppVeyor execute a simple D script that builds all binaries, e.g.

dub fetch --version="~master" dfix && dub build dfix
dub fetch --version="~master" dfmt && dub build dfmt
dub fetch --version="~master" dscanner && dub build dscanner
dub fetch --version="~master" dcd && dub build --config=client dcd && dub build --config=server dcd

and then upload them to s3. For more user convenience, you could even bundle them in an installer

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member Author

wilzbach commented Jun 7, 2017

Ping @ZombineDev @bbasile @Hackerpilot

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 7, 2017

I've already given my opinion in the community discussions. The plus would be when the build.bat can be tested. since they tend to be less maintained.

@ghost ghost merged commit e115106 into dlang-community:master Jun 8, 2017
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant