Fix foreign key name change detection #6418
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As index renaming support was introduced a while back do the same for foreign key name changes. Signed-off-by: Christoph Krapp <[email protected]>
Both tests did expect a name change to result in an empty table diff in the past. When index renaming support was introduced the name of the test was not changed to reflect the new expectation. Signed-off-by: Christoph Krapp <[email protected]>
greg0ire
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2024
achterin
changed the title
|
Thanks @achterin ! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This changes how the schema comparator treats foreign key name changes.
The index renaming had the same behavior in the past, expecting a index name change to result in an empty table diff. This was changed some time ago but foreign key changes were still not picked up by the comparator. This pr will change that.
While at it, I've also changed the names of both tests to reflect the changes.
As it was discussed in #6413 the test code should be reworked to be as exact as possible. So essentially my changes got merged to 3.8.x and 3.9.x but got left out in the 4.0.x merge (#6417). This is the initial code with more precise testing as it tests for the added/removed foreign key constraints and not only the count for each of them.