It will be a graph of clickable nodes, each representing one claim.
The point is to make his (often vague) critics specify exactly where their models (or modelling philosophies) diverge.
The dataset is here. (There will be a version without my editorialising too.)
I'm more interested in the book as a repository of probably-true social science about past and present.
- Parse the whole book. This database only includes the claims in the analytical index on [ageofem.com].
- Probabilism. Rather than first-order logic, redo with sliders underneath each claim, and a set neural threshold for reaching implication.
- Persistence. Save your as json and share to clarify disagreements.