Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrading @typescript-eslint #48

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2020
Merged

upgrading @typescript-eslint #48

merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2020

Conversation

gagoar
Copy link
Owner

@gagoar gagoar commented May 28, 2020

For some odd reason, #15 does not see the need of upgrading @typescript-eslint but these libraries fail if eslint is ^7.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #48 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #48   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           16        16           
  Lines          305       305           
  Branches        49        49           
=========================================
  Hits           305       305           
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 16f5bd2...393d852. Read the comment docs.

@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented May 28, 2020

Code Climate has analyzed commit 393d852 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

@gagoar gagoar merged commit 8857aff into master May 28, 2020
@gagoar gagoar deleted the gg/@typescript-eslint branch May 28, 2020 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant