You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As mentioned in the paper, the results reported in 3 categories: simple, complex, and all.
and also in the sample_gt.json
there is a "type" property to show whether is simple or complex.
but this property is missing in the training and validation set. is there a way to distinguish between the two in the training set?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We did not generate such information for the training and validation
sets. The criteria to label tables as simple or complex is based on tables
without or with multi-rows/columns (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.10683.pdf),
so it should be possible to generate it in the training and validations
sets.
As mentioned in the paper, the results reported in 3 categories: simple, complex, and all.
and also in the sample_gt.json
there is a "type" property to show whether is simple or complex.
but this property is missing in the training and validation set. is there a way to distinguish between the two in the training set?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: