Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix/vaults table sorting #339

Merged

Conversation

crypto-engineer
Copy link
Contributor

@crypto-engineer crypto-engineer commented Jun 14, 2022

I updated the sorting based on numerical instead of lexical.

@crypto-engineer crypto-engineer added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 14, 2022
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 14, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
interbtc-ui-interlay ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 14, 2022 at 0:28AM (UTC)
interbtc-ui-interlay-testnet ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 14, 2022 at 0:28AM (UTC)
interbtc-ui-kintsugi ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 14, 2022 at 0:28AM (UTC)
interbtc-ui-kintsugi-testnet ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 14, 2022 at 0:28AM (UTC)

@github-actions
Copy link

Running Lighthouse audit...

Copy link
Collaborator

@tomjeatt tomjeatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

@peterslany peterslany left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @crypto-engineer, nice work, I think there are minor issues - mainly the one with comparison using < operator :)

@crypto-engineer crypto-engineer merged commit 61439b4 into interlay:master Jun 14, 2022
@crypto-engineer crypto-engineer deleted the bugfix/vaults-table-sorting branch June 14, 2022 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants