Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

language properties from 008/35-37 and 041 MARC codes #39

Open
wafschneider opened this issue Jun 7, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

language properties from 008/35-37 and 041 MARC codes #39

wafschneider opened this issue Jun 7, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@wafschneider
Copy link
Collaborator

wafschneider commented Jun 7, 2017

Currently, language properties from the 008/35-37 can have as their object a linked data resource from id.loc.gov, e.g.:

<bf:Work rdf:about="http://example.org/1#Work">
  <bf:language>
    <bf:Language rdf:about="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/languages/eng"/>
  </bf:language>
</bf:Work>

This seems a little more elaborate than necessary. Would it be better to just convert like this?

<bf:Work rdf:about="http://example.org/1#Work">
  <bf:language rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/languages/eng"/>
</bf:Work>

In addition, the 041 creates entities like this:

<bf:Work rdf:about="http://example.org/1#Work">
  <bf:language>
    <bf:Language>
      <bf:identifiedBy>
        <bf:Identifier>
          <rdf:value rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/languages/eng"/>
          <bf:source>
            <bf:Source rdf:about="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/languages"/>
          </bf:source>
        </bf:Identifier>
      </bf:identifiedBy>
    </bf:Language>
  </bf:language>
</bf:Work>

In the case where there is no bf:part property of the bf:Language entity, perhaps it would be better to simplify this down to the same pattern:

<bf:Work rdf:about="http://example.org/1#Work">
  <bf:language rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/languages/eng"/>
</bf:Work>
@kirkhess
Copy link
Contributor

kirkhess commented Jun 7, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants