-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core: reuse remote transcoder for stream #1849
core: reuse remote transcoder for stream #1849
Conversation
f3744b9
to
bd7b60f
Compare
We also want to remove the currentTranscoder from the go-livepeer/core/orchestrator.go Line 906 in 7a0fd1f
|
We also want to remove the currentTranscoder from the go-livepeer/core/orchestrator.go Line 840 in 7a0fd1f
|
5b8003e
to
cb99f0c
Compare
358d391
to
b248bef
Compare
021aa53
to
f659900
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good ! Just two very small comments.
Feel free to rebase and flatten the commit history once you've addressed those.
Let's use a commit message that indicates which packages were altered and also use that in the title of the PR
e.g. "core: re-use remote transcoder for stream"
f659900
to
0ec6d9d
Compare
0ec6d9d
to
fb76f12
Compare
3e8dcea
to
59b545b
Compare
I've pushed the changes to the same commit(will use !fixup henceforth), have a look. The Ts are getting removed from the list properly now, but don't seem to adding back, if there is no error. This is the assertion in question. Shouldn't it be 2 after the T succeeds? I'm not quite sure how would it get selected, if the T was not in the list in the first place. Any advice? |
@reubenr0d Transcoder 2 gets removed here: https://github.com/reubenr0d/go-livepeer/blob/59b545b57a94f350879307da304a838e99d2c390/core/orch_test.go#L343 |
Right, the comment "assert transcoder gets added back to remoteTranscoders if no transcoding error" threw me off, if it's not supposed to get added back, shall I just remove the last set of assertions after that comment? |
f45fb1b
to
e5654d8
Compare
@yondonfu Did you have any other remarks regarding the changes you requested ? |
See #1864 (comment) |
e5654d8
to
bf5397d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
What does this pull request do? Explain your changes. (required)
Specific updates (required)
How did you test each of these updates (required)
On local offchain setup:
Does this pull request close any open issues?
Fixes #1842
Fixes #1712
Fixes #1273
Checklist:
make
runs successfully./test.sh
pass