Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New WAI adaptation for PAI calculation option from Fang et al. #100

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

drnimbusrain
Copy link
Member

@drnimbusrain drnimbusrain commented Dec 13, 2023

@angehung5 This is the adaption of the WAI contribution using alpha (woody-to-total area ratio) for the PAI calculation option, PAI = LAI (1 - alpha), which is vegetation type dependent now.

This is based on Figure 1 of Fang et al., 2019: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000608

@angehung5
Copy link
Collaborator

angehung5 commented Dec 18, 2023

@drnimbusrain Are you using the Eq. 12 from Fang et al. 2019? If yes, how about the omega and gamma terms? Also should it be PAI = LAI / (1-alpha)? Otherwise, PAI would be less than LAI.

@drnimbusrain
Copy link
Member Author

@drnimbusrain Are you using the Eq. 12 from Fang et al. 2019? If yes, how about the omega and gamma terms? Also should it be PAI = LAI / (1-alpha)? Otherwise, PAI would be less than LAI.

Actually, I that is what I am using PAI = LAI/(1-alpha): https://github.com/noaa-oar-arl/canopy-app/pull/100/files#diff-784b83d59c46a5575c78286c41ec9665e53c5edad0c9a4bc4e97e4abdb6cb743R62

@angehung5
Copy link
Collaborator

@drnimbusrain Are you using the Eq. 12 from Fang et al. 2019? If yes, how about the omega and gamma terms? Also should it be PAI = LAI / (1-alpha)? Otherwise, PAI would be less than LAI.

Actually, I that is what I am using PAI = LAI/(1-alpha): https://github.com/noaa-oar-arl/canopy-app/pull/100/files#diff-784b83d59c46a5575c78286c41ec9665e53c5edad0c9a4bc4e97e4abdb6cb743R62

How about the clumping index (omega term)? The paper says "ΩE is the element clumping index, which quantifies the effect of foliage clumping at scales larger than shoots". Should it be included in the calculation?
Yeah I think we can ignore gamma (needle‐to‐shoot area ratio) since we are working on grown trees.

@drnimbusrain
Copy link
Member Author

drnimbusrain commented Dec 18, 2023

@angehung5 Ah, yes, there are some other details here with gamma_eff (needle-to-shoot ratio, i.e., effect of clumping within the shoot) and omega_eff (clumping index effect beyond the shoot).
However we have observed total omega, clumping index (within and beyond the shoot) which is defined by (see Eq. 16 here https://academic.oup.com/treephys/article/29/8/1069/1670149_

Omega = Omega_eff/gamma_eff ; Omega)_eff is the clumping beyond the shoot only, where the gamma_eff is the effect of clumping within the shoot.

So combining this with Zhang et al. PAI_eff = LAI/(1-alpha) * Omega_eff/gamma_eff, we have a final equation for PAI total (not effective)

PAI = LAI/(1-alpha) * Omega.
So I do need to revise this for explanation and to include the effects of total clumping index here to get PAI.

@drnimbusrain
Copy link
Member Author

@angehung5 OK, updated.

@angehung5
Copy link
Collaborator

@drnimbusrain Thanks Patrick! Just reviewed.

@drnimbusrain drnimbusrain merged commit a70321f into develop Dec 18, 2023
4 checks passed
@drnimbusrain drnimbusrain deleted the feature/wai2pai branch December 18, 2023 18:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants