Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds #327

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

priteshbandi
Copy link
Contributor

@priteshbandi priteshbandi commented Jun 26, 2023

updated timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds.

Updates based on updates in notaryproject/specifications#249

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #327 (674dbb3) into main (983e97d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #327   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.80%   74.80%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        2203     2203           
=======================================
  Hits         1648     1648           
  Misses        437      437           
  Partials      118      118           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
verifier/verifier.go 81.53% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link

@gokarnm gokarnm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT changed the title updated timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds fix: update timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds Jun 27, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Should we merge this PR after merging notaryproject/specifications#249?

@yizha1
Copy link
Contributor

yizha1 commented Jun 27, 2023

Agree with @shizhMSFT , we need to merge the spec first, then the implementation changes.

@priteshbandi priteshbandi merged commit 432c931 into notaryproject:main Jun 28, 2023
6 checks passed
@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2023
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants