Prevent double wrapping event emitter listeners

[dyladan]

Fixes #2971

This is an alternative solution to #3132

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3133 (dd40ed0) into main (dc67f4e) will decrease coverage by 1.95%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head dd40ed0 differs from pull request most recent head aee61dd. Consider uploading reports for the commit aee61dd to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3133      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.10%   91.15%   -1.96%     
==========================================
  Files         196       68     -128     
  Lines        6400     1855    -4545     
  Branches     1349      395     -954     
==========================================
- Hits         5959     1691    -4268     
+ Misses        441      164     -277     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/opentelemetry-resources/karma.worker.js	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...ckages/opentelemetry-sdk-trace-web/karma.worker.js	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...s/opentelemetry-core/src/platform/node/sdk-info.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...opentelemetry-core/src/platform/node/globalThis.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...pentelemetry-core/src/platform/node/performance.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...emetry-api-metrics/src/platform/node/globalThis.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...lemetry-resources/src/detectors/ProcessDetector.ts	31.81% <0.00%> (-68.19%)	⬇️
...perimental/packages/otlp-exporter-base/src/util.ts	79.41% <0.00%> (-17.65%)	⬇️
...ckages/opentelemetry-exporter-zipkin/src/zipkin.ts	84.48% <0.00%> (-15.52%)	⬇️
...lemetry-resources/src/detectors/BrowserDetector.ts	93.33% <0.00%> (-6.67%)	⬇️
... and 128 more

[dyladan]

@vmarchaud I know you already approved a different one but I prefer this solution. It depends on the sync nature of node but doesn't depend on any implementation details of on/once or the listener

[vmarchaud]

I know you already approved a different one but I prefer this solution. It depends on the sync nature of node but doesn't depend on any implementation details of on/once or the listener

This one is also fine to me (since it don't modify the bind fn).