[full-ci] chore: bump dependencies and go to 1.22

[fschade]

needs owncloud-ci/golang#137 before it can get green

fixes: #8584

[fschade]

+ make govulncheck
(re)installing /go/bin/govulncheck-v1.0.1
go: downloading golang.org/x/vuln v1.0.1
go: downloading golang.org/x/tools v0.12.1-0.20230815132531-74c255bcf846
go: downloading golang.org/x/sync v0.3.0
go: downloading golang.org/x/sys v0.11.0
/go/bin/govulncheck-v1.0.1 ./...
Scanning your code and 1695 packages across 318 dependent modules for known vulnerabilities...

No vulnerabilities found.

Share feedback at https://go.dev/s/govulncheck-feedback.

[phil-davis]

go-vulnerability-scan has passed - good.
https://drone.owncloud.com/owncloud/ocis/32673/9/6

[micbar]

please backport to stable-5.0 and stable-4.0

[phil-davis]

https://drone.owncloud.com/owncloud/ocis/32673/7/6

golangci-lint step failed.

evel=error msg="Running error: 1 error occurred:\n\t* 
can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter: goanalysis_metalinter: SA1027: package \"sync\" (isInitialPkg: true, needAnalyzeSource: true): 
runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference\n\n"

[fschade]

https://drone.owncloud.com/owncloud/ocis/32673/7/6

golangci-lint step failed.

evel=error msg="Running error: 1 error occurred:\n\t* 
can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter: goanalysis_metalinter: SA1027: package \"sync\" (isInitialPkg: true, needAnalyzeSource: true): 
runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference\n\n"

i ❤️ the phil live ticker, keep on... 🤗 , fixed.

[phil-davis]

https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&sinceLeakPeriod=true&pullRequest=8586&id=owncloud_ocis
For example: replacement are not allowed: github.com/go-micro/plugins/v4/store/nats-js-kv

drone passes, so do we merge this?

[fschade]

https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&sinceLeakPeriod=true&pullRequest=8586&id=owncloud_ocis For example: replacement are not allowed: github.com/go-micro/plugins/v4/store/nats-js-kv

drone passes, so do we merge this?

nope, please wait... i want to have the replaces explicit whitelisted

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud