Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

user sync utilities #1

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

user sync utilities #1

merged 11 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

dgirardi
Copy link
Collaborator

@dgirardi dgirardi commented Mar 6, 2024

Reimplementation of load-cookie and load-cookie-with-consent, from a single codebase, and adding GPP support.

GPP support is limited to accepting and relaying the gpp_sid and gpp query string parameters; there's currently no way to poll AMP for GPP.

Closes prebid/prebid-universal-creative#212
Closes prebid/prebid-universal-creative#226

Related: prebid/prebid-universal-creative#213

Copy link

@spotxslagle spotxslagle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

});
}

export function resolveParams(params, alwaysPollAMP = false, resolveConsent = resolveConsentParams) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approved on the assumption that everything is working as intended, but I am a bit curious why the resolveConsent var is used as a third parameter. As far as I can tell, resolveParams is only used by load syncs, which doesn't allow third argument to be passed in. I assume this is a placeholder for future development or something similar, but it did seem worth commenting on.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right it's unnecessary. I think at some point this function was more complex and I needed to mock this out from unit tests.

@bretg
Copy link
Contributor

bretg commented Jun 21, 2024

Let me see if I can summarize what this all about:

  1. You guys don't like load-cookie in the PUC repo
  2. So it's being banished to this separate repo
  3. Which means that companies supporting AMP need to be alerted to this move and upgrade their procedures to pull from 2 repos where they formerly dealt with one.

The README is pretty good. We'll just need to upgrade the AMP docs. People are likely to miss this shift because there's no such thing as a "major release" in this area.

@bretg bretg removed the needs docs label Jul 3, 2024
@bretg bretg merged commit 68d03e1 into prebid:master Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants