Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[issue-307] add 2 extra (on left and right) dots out of zommed box #308

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
# Latest

# v0.10.1
## What's Changed
After resampling the figure, the line goes beyond figure frontier indicating presence of data. https://github.com/predict-idlab/plotly-resampler/pull/308

# v0.10.0
## New Features
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions plotly_resampler/aggregation/plotly_aggregator_parser.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ def get_start_end_indices(hf_trace_data, axis_type, start, end) -> Tuple[int, in
x_step = hf_trace_data["x"].step
start_idx = int(max((start - x_start) // x_step, 0))
end_idx = int((end - x_start) // x_step)
start_idx = max(0, start_idx - 1)
end_idx = min(end_idx + 1, len(hf_trace_data["x"]))
return start_idx, end_idx
# TODO: this can be performed as-well for a fixed frequency range-index w/ freq

Expand All @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ def get_start_end_indices(hf_trace_data, axis_type, start, end) -> Tuple[int, in
# Search the index-positions
start_idx = bisect.bisect_left(hf_trace_data["x"], start)
end_idx = bisect.bisect_right(hf_trace_data["x"], end)
start_idx = max(0, start_idx - 1)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should certainly add some documentation / issue reference to which this is performed.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added to CHANGELOG.md. Do I need to mention it anywhere else?

end_idx = min(end_idx + 1, len(hf_trace_data["x"]))
return start_idx, end_idx

@staticmethod
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pyproject.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[tool.poetry]
name = "plotly-resampler" # Do not forget to update the __init__.py __version__ variable
version = "0.10.0"
version = "0.10.1"
description = "Visualizing large time series with plotly"
authors = ["Jonas Van Der Donckt", "Jeroen Van Der Donckt", "Emiel Deprost"]
readme = "README.md"
Expand Down
12 changes: 6 additions & 6 deletions tests/test_figure_resampler.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -296,8 +296,8 @@ def test_log_axis():
assert len(out) == 2
assert (x1 - x0) < 10
assert len(out[1]["x"]) == 1000
assert out[-1]["x"][0] >= 100
assert out[-1]["x"][-1] <= 50_000
assert out[-1]["x"][0] >= 99
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So here, you increase (i.e. lower) the left boundary, because (when possible) a datapoint to the left is added. Why is there no need to increase the right boundary?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(maybe because of a small rounding error with log?)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right!
-> end_idx = bisect.bisect_right(hf_trace_data["x"], end)
-> end == 49999.99999999999

Nevertheless alter boundary. It would benefit readability

assert out[-1]["x"][-1] <= 50_001


def test_add_traces_from_other_figure():
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -997,8 +997,8 @@ def test_time_tz_slicing():
start_idx, end_idx = PlotlyAggregatorParser.get_start_end_indices(
hf_data_dict, hf_data_dict["axis_type"], t_start, t_stop
)
assert (s.index[start_idx] - t_start) <= pd.Timedelta(seconds=1)
assert (s.index[min(end_idx, n - 1)] - t_stop) <= pd.Timedelta(seconds=1)
assert (s.index[start_idx] - t_start) <= pd.Timedelta(seconds=2)
assert (s.index[min(end_idx, n - 1)] - t_stop) <= pd.Timedelta(seconds=2)


def test_time_tz_slicing_different_timestamp():
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1064,10 +1064,10 @@ def test_different_tz_no_tz_series_slicing():
)
assert (
s.tz_localize(None).index[start_idx].tz_localize(t_start.tz) - t_start
) <= pd.Timedelta(seconds=1)
) <= pd.Timedelta(seconds=2)
assert (
s.tz_localize(None).index[end_idx].tz_localize(t_stop.tz) - t_stop
) <= pd.Timedelta(seconds=1)
) <= pd.Timedelta(seconds=2)


def test_multiple_tz_no_tz_series_slicing():
Expand Down
14 changes: 7 additions & 7 deletions tests/test_figurewidget_resampler.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ def test_hf_data_property_reload_data():
assert np.all(fwr.hf_data[0]["y"] == new_y)

fwr.reload_data()
assert (fwr.data[0]["x"][0] >= 10_000) & (fwr.data[0]["x"][-1] <= 20_000)
assert (fwr.data[0]["x"][0] >= 9_999) & (fwr.data[0]["x"][-1] <= 20_001)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would indeed suspsect that, like here, you need to alter both boundaries.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thnx!

assert np.all(fwr.data[0]["y"] == new_y[fwr.data[0]["x"]])
assert (fwr.layout["yaxis"].range[0] == -20) & (fwr.layout["yaxis"].range[-1] == 3)

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -869,8 +869,8 @@ def test_hf_data_property_subplots_reload_data():
assert np.all(fwr.hf_data[0]["y"] == new_y)

fwr.reload_data()
assert (fwr.data[0]["x"][0] >= 10_000) & (fwr.data[0]["x"][-1] <= 20_000)
assert (fwr.data[1]["x"][0] >= 40_000) & (fwr.data[1]["x"][-1] <= 60_000)
assert (fwr.data[0]["x"][0] >= 9_999) & (fwr.data[0]["x"][-1] <= 20_001)
assert (fwr.data[1]["x"][0] >= 39_999) & (fwr.data[1]["x"][-1] <= 60_001)
assert np.all(fwr.data[0]["y"] == new_y[fwr.data[0]["x"]])
assert np.all(fwr.data[1]["y"] == new_y[fwr.data[1]["x"]])
assert (fwr.layout["yaxis"].range[0] == -20) & (fwr.layout["yaxis"].range[-1] == 3)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -900,8 +900,8 @@ def test_hf_data_subplots_non_shared_xaxes():
assert 0 <= x_0[0] <= (n / 1000)
assert (n - 1000) <= x_0[-1] <= n - 1
x_1 = fwr.data[1]["x"]
assert 40_000 <= x_1[0] <= 40_000 + (20_000 / 1000)
assert (60_000 - 20_000 / 1_000) <= x_1[-1] <= 60_000
assert 39_999 <= x_1[0] <= 40_001 + (20_000 / 1000)
assert (60_000 - 20_000 / 1_000) <= x_1[-1] <= 60_001


def test_hf_data_subplots_non_shared_xaxes_row_col_none():
Expand All @@ -925,8 +925,8 @@ def test_hf_data_subplots_non_shared_xaxes_row_col_none():
assert 0 <= x_0[0] <= (n / 1000)
assert (n - 1000) <= x_0[-1] <= n - 1
x_1 = fwr.data[1]["x"]
assert 40_000 <= x_1[0] <= 40_000 + (20_000 / 1000)
assert (60_000 - 20_000 / 1_000) <= x_1[-1] <= 60_000
assert 39_999 <= x_1[0] <= 40_001 + (20_000 / 1000)
assert (60_000 - 20_000 / 1_000) <= x_1[-1] <= 60_001


def test_updates_two_traces():
Expand Down