Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Selftests sometimes fail on pypy: TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object ...> #11771

Closed
bluetech opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 12 comments · Fixed by #12557
Assignees
Labels
good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor type: selftests a problem in the tests of pytest

Comments

@bluetech
Copy link
Member

bluetech commented Jan 4, 2024

Example: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/actions/runs/7408595776/job/20157160097

This doesn't always happen, maybe 50% of the time. Started in the last few days. I checked if the PyPy version changed during these days, but seems not (it's 3.8.16).

The error is:

 __________________ ERROR collecting testing/_py/test_local.py __________________
/opt/hostedtoolcache/PyPy/3.8.16/x64/lib/pypy3.8/importlib/__init__.py:127: in import_module
    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:1023: in _gcd_import
    ???
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:1000: in _find_and_load
    ???
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:984: in _find_and_load_unlocked
    ???
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:680: in _load_unlocked
    ???
.tox/pypy3-xdist/lib/pypy3.8/site-packages/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py:166: in exec_module
    source_stat, co = _rewrite_test(fn, self.config)
.tox/pypy3-xdist/lib/pypy3.8/site-packages/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py:350: in _rewrite_test
    co = compile(tree, strfn, "exec", dont_inherit=True)
E   TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Store object at 0x0000000002142880>

Sometimes it says TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object at 0x000000000365d040> instead.

@bluetech bluetech added the type: selftests a problem in the tests of pytest label Jan 4, 2024
skirpichev added a commit to skirpichev/mpmath that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2024
skirpichev added a commit to skirpichev/mpmath that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2024
@skirpichev
Copy link

I have same failure on older versions as well. E.g. 7.4.3:
https://github.com/mpmath/mpmath/actions/runs/8030300102?pr=759

This happens for all tested in the mpmath pypy versions (3.8-3.10). But most often on 3.10.

@skirpichev
Copy link

Another example: #11168 (comment)

@cfbolz, I don't see a bugreport in pypy issues. Is there any chance this might be related to #11168 (an fixed in pypy)?

@cfbolz
Copy link

cfbolz commented Mar 30, 2024

@skirpichev it's not impossible that it's the same problem, yes. You can try a nightly PyPy build (or wait for the next release but that is still a bit out).

@skirpichev
Copy link

skirpichev commented Mar 31, 2024

@cfbolz, thanks for a suggestion. I did tests for nightly builds (on 3.8-3.10) and, after ~20 re-runs, I got a TypeError on pypy3.8, which is similar to this issue:

============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.8.16[pypy-7.3.12-alpha], pytest-8.1.1, pluggy-1.4.0
mpmath backend: python
mpmath mp class: <mpmath.ctx_mp.MPContext object at 0x00000000018deb10>
mpmath version: 1.4.0a1.dev43+g534bc79
Python version: 3.8.16 (d8e6b37f5231c7b59b2b639a651dd696a3732cc3, Jan 09 2023, 00:30:15)
[PyPy 7.3.12-alpha0 with GCC 10.2.1 20210130 (Red Hat 10.2.1-11)]
rootdir: /home/runner/work/mpmath/mpmath
configfile: pyproject.toml
testpaths: mpmath, docs
plugins: cov-5.0.0, xdist-3.5.0
created: 4/4 workers
4 workers [2294 items]

........................................................................ [  3%]
........................................................................ [  6%]
........................................................................ [  9%]
........................................................................ [ 12%]
........................................................................ [ 15%]
........................................................................ [ 18%]
........................................................................ [ 21%]
........................................................................ [ 25%]
........................................................................ [ 28%]
........................................................................ [ 31%]
........................................................................ [ 34%]
........................................................................ [ 37%]
........................................................................ [ 40%]
........................................................................ [ 43%]
........................................................................ [ 47%]
........................................................................ [ 50%]
........................................................................ [ 53%]
........................................................................ [ 56%]
........................................................................ [ 59%]
........................................................................ [ 62%]
........................................................................ [ 65%]
........................................................................ [ 69%]
........................................................................ [ 72%]
......................................................................... [ 75%]
........................................................................ [ 78%]
........................................................................ [ 81%]
........................................................................ [ 84%]
........................................................................ [ 87%]
........................................x............................... [ 91%]
.......................................x................................ [ 94%]
...................................s.................................... [ 97%]
.............................................................            [100%]
==================================== ERRORS ====================================
_______________ ERROR collecting mpmath/tests/test_basic_ops.py ________________
../../_temp/d367cbdc-8911-4ebe-aab6-2151925ee5c2/pypy-c-jit-106755-d8e6b37f5231-linux64/lib/pypy3.8/importlib/__init__.py:127: in import_module
    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:1023: in _gcd_import
    ???
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:1000: in _find_and_load
    ???
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:984: in _find_and_load_unlocked
    ???
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:680: in _load_unlocked
    ???
../../_temp/d367cbdc-8911-4ebe-aab6-2151925ee5c2/pypy-c-jit-106755-d8e6b37f5231-linux64/lib/pypy3.8/site-packages/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py:169: in exec_module
    source_stat, co = _rewrite_test(fn, self.config)
../../_temp/d367cbdc-8911-4ebe-aab6-2151925ee5c2/pypy-c-jit-106755-d8e6b37f5231-linux64/lib/pypy3.8/site-packages/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py:353: in _rewrite_test
    co = compile(tree, strfn, "exec", dont_inherit=True)
E   TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Attribute object at 0x00007f101d7a6920>
============================= slowest 20 durations =============================
34.04s call     mpmath/tests/test_functions2.py::test_bessel_zeros_extra
28.52s call     mpmath/tests/test_torture.py::test_asymp[<lambda>-150-False23]
16.64s call     mpmath/functions/hypergeometric.py::mpmath.functions.hypergeometric.hyper
11.94s call     mpmath/tests/test_extra_zeta.py::test_zetazero[241389216-97490234.22767118]
10.72s call     mpmath/functions/zeta.py::mpmath.functions.zeta.secondzeta
9.91s call     mpmath/tests/test_elliptic.py::test_elliptic_integrals
9.25s call     mpmath/ctx_fp.py::mpmath.ctx_fp.FPContext.bessely
8.75s call     mpmath/functions/hypergeometric.py::mpmath.functions.hypergeometric.hyp3f2
8.59s call     mpmath/ctx_fp.py::mpmath.ctx_fp.FPContext.siegelz
8.44s call     mpmath/calculus/extrapolation.py::mpmath.calculus.extrapolation.nsum
8.39s call     mpmath/tests/test_torture.py::test_asymp[<lambda>-150-False9]
7.87s call     mpmath/functions/zetazeros.py::mpmath.functions.zetazeros.nzeros
7.58s call     mpmath/tests/test_torture.py::test_asymp[f_wrapped-1500-False1]
7.53s call     mpmath/tests/test_quad.py::test_quadosc
7.50s call     mpmath/calculus/quadrature.py::mpmath.calculus.quadrature.QuadratureMethods.quad
7.45s call     mpmath/tests/test_torture.py::test_asymp[f_wrapped-90-False]
7.27s call     mpmath/tests/test_torture.py::test_asymp[f-5000-True1]
7.22s call     mpmath/tests/test_torture.py::test_asymp[<lambda>-150-False27]
7.00s call     mpmath/tests/test_torture.py::test_asymp[<lambda>-150-False37]
6.74s call     mpmath/tests/test_torture.py::test_asymp[<lambda>-150-False36]
=========================== short test summary info ============================
ERROR mpmath/tests/test_basic_ops.py - TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Attribute object at 0x00007f101d7a6920>
======= 2291 passed, 1 skipped, 2 xfailed, 1 error in 203.43s (0:03:23) ========

Summary page: https://github.com/mpmath/mpmath/actions/runs/8491432157?pr=772

Maybe this fix isn't merged yet to the 3.8 branch (as it was stated in your blog post)? If so, I'll continue testing.

@cfbolz
Copy link

cfbolz commented Mar 31, 2024

Yes, the 3.8 variants are not maintained any more, you need to try 3.9 or 3.10. Thanks for trying this out!

@skirpichev
Copy link

Well, I did ~50 re-runs of mpmath's tests on pypy3.9 and pypy3.10 - without any failures. Given the previous statistics, probably there is a chance that this issue was fixed in PyPy's nightly builds. I'll switch regular tests for pypy3.9/10 to them.

Thanks for bugfix!

@cfbolz
Copy link

cfbolz commented Apr 2, 2024

Well, I did ~50 re-runs of mpmath's tests on pypy3.9 and pypy3.10 - without any failures.

thank you for trying this, that's very valuable feedback!

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Jul 1, 2024

Sometimes it says TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object at 0x000000000365d040> instead.

During the sprints, we were seeing 3–4 variants of different AST object reprs there. Hopefully, bumping PyPy in CI will fix this. Ronny suggested this, but nobody got to actually doing it...

@webknjaz webknjaz added the good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor label Jul 1, 2024
@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Jul 1, 2024

FTR @LilyFoote linked https://www.pypy.org/posts/2024/03/fixing-bug-incremental-gc.html in #11168 (comment) but that reference never got cross-posted into this issue.

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Jul 1, 2024

Action item for whoever gets to prepare the PR:

@x612skm
Copy link
Contributor

x612skm commented Jul 1, 2024

Working on this issue

x612skm added a commit to x612skm/pytest-dev--pytest that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2024
PyPy 3.8 has a flaky bug in the garbage collector that is not going to be fixed there since that version is EoL,
but newer version have it addressed.
Here's the problem we're seeing in the CI -
TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object ...>
Here's the Link to the explanation - pytest-dev#11771 (comment)
Resolved pytest-dev#11771
@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Jul 2, 2024

Sometimes it says TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object at 0x000000000365d040> instead.

I even saw a case of NameError, which seems to have the same root cause:

 E   NameError: name '@py_assert2' is not defined

(https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/actions/runs/9746885084/job/26898335196#step:6:97)

x612skm added a commit to x612skm/pytest-dev--pytest that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2024
PyPy 3.8 has a flaky bug in the garbage collector that is not going to be fixed there since that version is EoL,
but newer version have it addressed.
Here's the problem we're seeing in the CI
```TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object ...>
```
Here's the Link to the explanation
Resolves pytest-dev#11771
x612skm added a commit to x612skm/pytest-dev--pytest that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2024
PyPy 3.8 has a flaky bug in the garbage collector that is not going to be fixed there since that version is EoL,
but newer version have it addressed.
Here's the problem we're seeing in the CI:

```
TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object ...>
```

Here's the Link to the explanation
Resolves pytest-dev#11771
x612skm added a commit to x612skm/pytest-dev--pytest that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2024
PyPy 3.8 has a flaky bug in the garbage collector that is not going to be fixed there since that version is EoL,
but newer version have it addressed.
Here's the problem we're seeing in the CI:

"TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object ...>"

Here's the Link to the explanation
Resolves pytest-dev#11771
x612skm added a commit to x612skm/pytest-dev--pytest that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2024
PyPy 3.8 has a flaky bug in the garbage collector that is not going to
be fixed there since that version is EoL, but newer versions have it
addressed.

The problem manifests itself in CI as follows:

    ```console
    TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object ...>
    ```

This patch makes use of the PyPy version that is still supported
and contains a fix for the said bug.

Ref: https://www.pypy.org/posts/2024/03/fixing-bug-incremental-gc.html

Resolves pytest-dev#11771.
x612skm added a commit to x612skm/pytest-dev--pytest that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2024
@webknjaz webknjaz linked a pull request Jul 19, 2024 that will close this issue
x612skm added a commit to x612skm/pytest-dev--pytest that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2024
PyPy 3.8 has a flaky bug in the garbage collector that is not going to
be fixed there since that version is EoL, but newer versions have it
addressed.

The problem manifests itself in CI as follows:

    ```console
    TypeError: expected some sort of stmt, but got <_ast.Load object ...>
    ```

This patch makes use of the PyPy version that is still supported
and contains a fix for the said bug.

Ref: https://www.pypy.org/posts/2024/03/fixing-bug-incremental-gc.html

Resolves pytest-dev#11771.
x612skm added a commit to x612skm/pytest-dev--pytest that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2024
Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor type: selftests a problem in the tests of pytest
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants