Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.27] Bump K3s version for v1.27 to fix regression in agent's supervisor port #6207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

brandond
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

Updates k3s: k3s-io/k3s@76ba9db...cb36c91

Types of Changes

bugfix

Verification

Testing

Linked Issues

User-Facing Change


Further Comments

@brandond brandond requested a review from a team as a code owner June 13, 2024 23:53
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 26.11%. Comparing base (9c3cb32) to head (2e53b9c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on release-1.27.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           release-1.27    #6207   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage         26.11%   26.11%           
=============================================
  Files                32       32           
  Lines              2684     2684           
=============================================
  Hits                701      701           
  Misses             1940     1940           
  Partials             43       43           
Flag Coverage Δ
inttests 9.76% <ø> (ø)
unittests 18.59% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@brandond brandond merged commit 180bd1e into rancher:release-1.27 Jun 14, 2024
5 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@VestigeJ VestigeJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've lost permissions again to approve on this repo which is unfortunate but LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants