Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use rapids-build-backend #181

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Member

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#31
Contributes to rapidsai/dependency-file-generator#89

Proposes introducing rapids-build-backend as this project's build backend, to reduce the complexity of various CI/build scripts.

@jameslamb jameslamb added improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Jun 4, 2024
@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title WIP: use rapids-build-backend use rapids-build-backend Jun 4, 2024
@jameslamb jameslamb marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2024 19:35
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from a team as a code owner June 4, 2024 19:35
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from bdice June 4, 2024 19:35
dependencies.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from bdice June 5, 2024 18:53
Copy link
Contributor

@bdice bdice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@jameslamb jameslamb requested review from a team as code owners June 10, 2024 13:58
@jameslamb jameslamb requested review from AyodeAwe and removed request for a team June 10, 2024 13:58
@jameslamb
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit c92bba3 into rapidsai:branch-24.08 Jun 10, 2024
48 checks passed
@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the rapids-build-backend branch June 10, 2024 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants