Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more internal callsites for better stack frames #1699

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 9, 2022

Conversation

rickhanlonii
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary:

Adds more internal callsites to clean up log box internal stack frame collapsing.

Test Plan:

Before

Notice how the code frame is not the error in the user code:
Screen Shot 2022-09-08 at 9 20 54 AM

After

Now it is:
Screen Shot 2022-09-08 at 11 16 31 AM

@thymikee
Copy link
Member

thymikee commented Sep 8, 2022

cc @motiz88 @huntie, mind reviewing that?
@rickhanlonii can you run yarn lint --fix?

@rickhanlonii
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@motiz88 @huntie I'm also curious - do we know why the stack frame says "" and "global code"? Is there something more relevant we can display there or is it from Hermes? And should we collapse the .bundle frames by default (the second frame in the "after" image)?

@motiz88
Copy link
Collaborator

motiz88 commented Sep 8, 2022

I'm not sure where the string global code is coming from (engine-specific?) but this actually seems pretty informative: it points to the error being in the initialisation path, and the .bundle means this is generated code with no source mapping. We could somewhat reasonably map this particular case to somewhere in the bundle's entry point, but technically that frame does live outside of that module, so it's an ambiguous symbolication and I'd avoid it.

I would also not collapse all .bundle frames ( = all unsymbolicated frames) as it's a bit too indiscriminate, especially for cases where symbolication might be broken for whatever reason. But maybe matching the global code string (and its equivalents in other engines) alongside .bundle is a good heuristic. Unsymbolicated global code = most likely bundle infrastructure that can't be mapped to any file on disk.

@@ -14,9 +14,14 @@ const INTERNAL_CALLSITES_REGEX = new RegExp(
'/Libraries/YellowBox/.+\\.js$',
'/Libraries/LogBox/.+\\.js$',
'/Libraries/Core/Timers/.+\\.js$',
'/Libraries/WebSocket/.+\\.js',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
'/Libraries/WebSocket/.+\\.js',
'/Libraries/WebSocket/.+\\.js$',

@@ -14,9 +14,14 @@ const INTERNAL_CALLSITES_REGEX = new RegExp(
'/Libraries/YellowBox/.+\\.js$',
'/Libraries/LogBox/.+\\.js$',
'/Libraries/Core/Timers/.+\\.js$',
'/Libraries/WebSocket/.+\\.js',
'/Libraries/vendor/.+\\.js',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
'/Libraries/vendor/.+\\.js',
'/Libraries/vendor/.+\\.js$',

'/node_modules/react-devtools-core/.+\\.js$',
'/node_modules/react-refresh/.+\\.js$',
'/node_modules/scheduler/.+\\.js$',
'/node_modules/event-target-shim/.+\\.js$',
'/metro-runtime/.+\\.js$',
'\\[native code\\]',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
'\\[native code\\]',
'^\\[native code\\]$',

I suspect this string may be engine-specific - have you tested this on both JSC and Hermes?

Also, bikeshedding: might be useful to include native code as intermediate frames, though I agree they're less useful at the top since we have no JS code frame to show there.

@@ -14,9 +14,14 @@ const INTERNAL_CALLSITES_REGEX = new RegExp(
'/Libraries/YellowBox/.+\\.js$',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if all of these should be prefixed with react-native. (Not sure)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah probably -- I opted to minimize the diff because I wasn't sure why it was this way.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rickhanlonii mind following up with a PR with adjusted paths?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason the react-native prefix is missing is because forks of React Native such as react-native-tvos (and react-native-windows?) have copies of these files but are installed within node_modules using their forked name. If you match on react-native, you'll break YellowBox for all forks. You might want to use node_modules\/(react-native(?:-(.*?))?)\/ here and below where you added the match on /node_modules/react-native/index.js.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A wild Nakazawa appears!

Christoph used Context.

It's super effective!

@motiz88
Copy link
Collaborator

motiz88 commented Sep 8, 2022

I might be missing something but how does the invariant stack frame get skipped? Not seeing any pattern that specifically targets it.

@rickhanlonii
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Nice catch, I missed this copying it over.

Copy link
Member

@thymikee thymikee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @rickhanlonii and @motiz88

@thymikee thymikee changed the title Add more internal callsites Add more internal callsites for better stack frames Sep 9, 2022
@thymikee thymikee merged commit 58ca7f1 into react-native-community:main Sep 9, 2022
@rickhanlonii rickhanlonii deleted the rh-metro-config branch September 13, 2022 01:21
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit to facebook/react-native that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2022
Summary:
In 2017, React published v15.5 which extracted the built-in `prop types` to a separate package to reflect the fact that not everybody uses them. In 2018, React Native started to remove `PropTypes` from React Native for the same reason. In 0.68 React Native introduced a deprecation warning which notified users that the change was coming, and in 0.69 we removed the PropTypes entirely.

The feedback we've received from the community is that there has not been enough time to migrate libraries off of PropTypes. This has resulted in users needing to patch the React Native package `index.js` file directly to add back the PropTypes, instead of migrating off of them. We can empathize with this fix short term (it unblocks the upgrade) but long term this patch will cause users to miss important changes to `index.js`, and add a maintenance cost for users.

Part of the reason there was not enough time is that we didn't do a good job surfacing libraries that were using PropTypes. This means, when you got a deprecation warning, it wasn't clear where the source of the usage was (either in your code or in a library). So even if you wanted to migrate, it was difficult to know where to actually make the change.

In the next release, we've made it easier to find call sites using deprecated types by [fixing the code frame in errors](react-native-community/cli#1699) reporting in LogBox, and ensuring that [the app doesn't crash without a warning](#34650). This should make it easier to identify exactly where the deprecated usage is, so you can migrate it.

To help users get off of the patch, and allow more time to migrate, we're walking back the removal of PropTypes, and keeping it as a deprecation for a couple more versions. We ask that you either migrate off PropTypes to a type system like TypeScript, or migrate to the `deprecated-react-native-prop-types` package.

Once we feel more confident that the community has migrated and will not need to patch React Native in order to fix this issue, we'll remove the PropTypes again. **If you have any trouble finding the source of the PropType usage, please file an issue so we can help track it down with you.**

Changelog:
[General][Changed] - Add back deprecated PropTypes

Reviewed By: yungsters

Differential Revision: D40725705

fbshipit-source-id: 8ce61be30343827efd6dc89a012eeef0b6676deb
OlimpiaZurek pushed a commit to OlimpiaZurek/react-native that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
Summary:
In 2017, React published v15.5 which extracted the built-in `prop types` to a separate package to reflect the fact that not everybody uses them. In 2018, React Native started to remove `PropTypes` from React Native for the same reason. In 0.68 React Native introduced a deprecation warning which notified users that the change was coming, and in 0.69 we removed the PropTypes entirely.

The feedback we've received from the community is that there has not been enough time to migrate libraries off of PropTypes. This has resulted in users needing to patch the React Native package `index.js` file directly to add back the PropTypes, instead of migrating off of them. We can empathize with this fix short term (it unblocks the upgrade) but long term this patch will cause users to miss important changes to `index.js`, and add a maintenance cost for users.

Part of the reason there was not enough time is that we didn't do a good job surfacing libraries that were using PropTypes. This means, when you got a deprecation warning, it wasn't clear where the source of the usage was (either in your code or in a library). So even if you wanted to migrate, it was difficult to know where to actually make the change.

In the next release, we've made it easier to find call sites using deprecated types by [fixing the code frame in errors](react-native-community/cli#1699) reporting in LogBox, and ensuring that [the app doesn't crash without a warning](facebook#34650). This should make it easier to identify exactly where the deprecated usage is, so you can migrate it.

To help users get off of the patch, and allow more time to migrate, we're walking back the removal of PropTypes, and keeping it as a deprecation for a couple more versions. We ask that you either migrate off PropTypes to a type system like TypeScript, or migrate to the `deprecated-react-native-prop-types` package.

Once we feel more confident that the community has migrated and will not need to patch React Native in order to fix this issue, we'll remove the PropTypes again. **If you have any trouble finding the source of the PropType usage, please file an issue so we can help track it down with you.**

Changelog:
[General][Changed] - Add back deprecated PropTypes

Reviewed By: yungsters

Differential Revision: D40725705

fbshipit-source-id: 8ce61be30343827efd6dc89a012eeef0b6676deb
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants