Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reword descriptions of the deprecated int modules #107654

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2023
Merged

reword descriptions of the deprecated int modules #107654

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2023

Conversation

pitaj
Copy link
Contributor

@pitaj pitaj commented Feb 4, 2023

Based on recommendation by @est31 here: #107587 (comment)

This is meant to make it more clear, when looking at the std or core docs, that these are deprecated modules - not deprecated integer types (a common misunderstanding).

Before:
image

After:
image

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 4, 2023

r? @thomcc

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 4, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 4, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

Copy link
Member

@est31 est31 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, "redundant" is a good choice I think, instead of "deprecated" which we cannot use unless we deprecate.

@pitaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

pitaj commented Feb 4, 2023

Yeah my main reason for not using "deprecated" is because it says it's deprecated right there already.

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Feb 13, 2023

Looks great

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 13, 2023

📌 Commit d105234 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 13, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#107654 (reword descriptions of the deprecated int modules)
 - rust-lang#107915 (Add `array::map` benchmarks)
 - rust-lang#107961 (Avoid copy-pasting the `ilog` panic string in a bunch of places)
 - rust-lang#107962 (Add a doc note about why `Chain` is not `ExactSizeIterator`)
 - rust-lang#107966 (Update browser-ui-test version to 0.14.3)
 - rust-lang#107970 (Hermit: Remove floor symbol)
 - rust-lang#107973 (Fix unintentional UB in SIMD tests)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4735829 into rust-lang:master Feb 13, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants