Use implementation name dart-sass for VersionResponse

[ntkme]

This is mostly cosmetic.

As documented by https://sass-lang.com/documentation/js-api/variables/info/:

For Dart Sass, the implementation name is dart-sass.

The motivation is that I'm enhancing the .info string for ruby host, and I want to use the implementation name returned by the VersionResponse and produce an output like below:

irb(main):001> require 'sass-embedded';
irb(main):002> puts Sass.info;
sass-embedded	1.69.6	(Embedded Host)	[Ruby]
dart-sass	1.69.6	(Sass Compiler)	[Dart]

[nex3]

I'm a little worried that this is technically a breaking change (although hopefully not one that affects much, since there's only one embedded compiler implementation at the moment). I'm not sure it's strictly an improvement, either; "Dart Sass" is generally a more appropriate name for human presentation. If this is desired, I think I'd be more comfortable adding a new identifier field to the protocol that's required to be a valid CSS identifier and leaving name as human-readable.

[ntkme]

@nex3 I checked some known host implementations and no one depends on this field right now. I feel we can just change it instead of making protocol change which is more work.

• https://github.com/ahabhgk/sass-embedded-host-rust
• https://github.com/bep/godartsass
• https://github.com/charitybell/ESass
• https://github.com/johnfairh/swift-sass
• https://github.com/larsgrefer/dart-sass-java
• https://github.com/sass/embedded-host-node
• https://github.com/sass-contrib/sass-embedded-host-ruby
• https://github.com/Taritsyn/DartSassHost

[nex3]

All right, if no one's using it I suppose this works.