Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fit method for feature ranges #91

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 16, 2022
Merged

fit method for feature ranges #91

merged 9 commits into from
Jun 16, 2022

Conversation

sgbaird
Copy link
Member

@sgbaird sgbaird commented Jun 13, 2022

Co-Authored-By: Hasan Muhammad Sayeed [email protected]

Co-Authored-By: Hasan Muhammad Sayeed <[email protected]>
@sgbaird
Copy link
Member Author

sgbaird commented Jun 13, 2022

#89

planning to come back to this a bit later

@sgbaird sgbaird linked an issue Jun 13, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
sgbaird and others added 5 commits June 13, 2022 13:15
atomic_numbers use np.min/max instead of quantiles
space_group use np.min/max instead of quantiles
rest use quantiles
assert tests is just fixing it to its current output. Need to go back and manually verify this.
@sgbaird sgbaird changed the title basic port of notebook functionality (WIP) fit method for feature ranges Jun 14, 2022
@sgbaird
Copy link
Member Author

sgbaird commented Jun 16, 2022

Merging for now, lmk if you think the fit method behavior should change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

consider implementing fit method
1 participant