Improve local testing #1245
Open
Improve local testing #1245
+41
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JakNowy
force-pushed
the
feature/allow-running-specific-test
branch
from
5e431f7
to
1bf78d5
Compare
JakNowy
force-pushed
the
feature/allow-running-specific-test
branch
from
1bf78d5
to
a4833d3
Compare
JakNowy
changed the title
JakNowy
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wanted to pass a specific test to be run with pytest. Initially I came with modifying
test.shscript so it accepts additional parameter. Then noticed it's already supported intests-start.sh.This PR therefore updates the backend README.md, advising you to run more flexible
tests-start.shwhich calls the other under the hood. Now that a single test can be run (useful in development), I'm also enabling --no-coverage flag for skipping coverage calculation during development. Additional --message argument is being introduced to ensure alignment with CI coverage message.