Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tool to add a top layer with specified thickness to a mesh #649

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2015

Conversation

TomFischer
Copy link
Member

Erik and Marc requested a small tool to add a new top layer to a mesh. Hope it will be useful.
See also the documentation.

@TomFischer TomFischer changed the title [U/ME] Init. impl. of util AddTopLayer. Tool to add a top layer with specified thickness to a mesh Apr 17, 2015
/*
* \date 2015-04-14
* \brief Adds a top layer to an existing mesh.
*/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

copyright header missing. [TF] fixed.

@endJunction
Copy link
Member

⏩ after the copyright header is corrected.

@bilke
Copy link
Member

bilke commented Apr 17, 2015

Nice docs! 📚

#include "MeshLib/Elements/Element.h"
#include "MeshLib/Elements/Prism.h"
#include "MeshLib/Elements/Hex.h"
#include "MeshLib/Elements/Quad.h"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

technically, several includes are missing (tri, line, etc.) ✅

rinkk added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2015
Tool to add a top layer with specified thickness to a mesh
@rinkk rinkk merged commit 31f4da0 into ufz:master Apr 23, 2015
@TomFischer TomFischer deleted the AddSoilLayerTool branch April 23, 2015 10:18
@ogsbot
Copy link
Member

ogsbot commented Jun 19, 2020

OpenGeoSys development has been moved to GitLab.

See this pull request on GitLab.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants