-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WFCORE-5532] Provide an Elytron equivalent for realm readiness checking #511
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
the realm. New method will be added to security domain that will check its map of realms to find out | ||
whether the domain contains users. | ||
|
||
For a `SecurityDomain` with multiple `SecurityRealm` references the `isReadyForAuthentication` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could do the same for distributed-realm
. Do we want to deal with such corner cases? Can we assume that when a realm other than properties or filesystem realm is set the admin/user is probably experienced enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will have a look at distributed, aggregate and fail over but IMO yes once a user is using them they don't need us to remind them how to add their users - TBH any instructions to use add-user.sh at that point will likely be wrong anyway.
…gregate and fail-over realms.
|
||
=== Issue | ||
|
||
* https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5533[WFCORE-5533] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is WFCORE-5532, not 33.
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5532