Feature: unique name filtering for call interceptors

[mikel785]

Hello guys:

Found and fixed a strange behavior when call interception mechanics works perfect with unnamed services but always failing for named services. Down there is slightly modified test code to reproduce the problem:

		[TestMethod]
		public void CallInterceptionBug()
		{
			using (var host = new ZyanComponentHost("FirstTestServer", 18888))
			{
				host.RegisterComponent<ITestService, TestService>("Blah", ActivationType.Singleton);

				using (var connection = new ZyanConnection("tcp://127.0.0.1:18888/FirstTestServer") { CallInterceptionEnabled = true })
				{
					// add a call interceptor for the TestService.TestMethod
					connection.CallInterceptors.Add(CallInterceptor.For<ITestService>().Action(service => service.TestMethod(), data =>
					{
						data.Intercepted = true;
						data.MakeRemoteCall();
						data.ReturnValue = nameof(TestService);
					}));

					var testService = connection.CreateProxy<ITestService>("Blah");
					var result = testService.TestMethod();
					Assert.AreEqual(nameof(TestService), result);
				}
			}
		}

Also implemented name filtering feature for CallInterceptor to specify unique via regex not by just equality compare to make interceptor declaration more flexible:

					connection.CallInterceptors.Add(CallInterceptor.For<ITestService>()
						.WithUniqueNameFilter(@"NamedService\d+")
						.Action(service => service.TestMethod(), data =>
						{
							data.ReturnValue = $"intercepted_{data.MakeRemoteCall()}";
							data.Intercepted = true;
						})); 

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #79 into master will increase coverage by 0.16%.
The diff coverage is 78.23%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #79      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.46%   68.63%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         297      297              
  Lines       22488    22639     +151     
  Branches     1952     1978      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits        15397    15538     +141     
- Misses       6271     6273       +2     
- Partials      820      828       +8     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
source/Zyan.Communication/CallInterceptorHelper.cs	32.53% <63.15%> (+6.45%)	⬆️
source/Zyan.Communication/CallInterceptionData.cs	81.48% <66.66%> (-2.52%)	⬇️
source/Zyan.Tests/CallInterceptionTests.cs	85.47% <77.08%> (-5.57%)	⬇️
...ource/Zyan.Communication/CallInterceptorBuilder.cs	98.79% <87.50%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
source/Zyan.Communication/CallInterceptor.cs	66.00% <100.00%> (+7.46%)	⬆️
...ce/Zyan.Communication/CallInterceptorCollection.cs	63.41% <100.00%> (-2.50%)	⬇️
source/Zyan.Communication/ZyanProxy.cs	77.74% <100.00%> (ø)
...an.Communication/Threading/SimpleLockThreadPool.cs	84.90% <0.00%> (+0.94%)	⬆️
...yan.Communication/InterLinq/Types/TypeConverter.cs	74.01% <0.00%> (+9.44%)	⬆️
...ation/InterLinq/Types/Anonymous/AnonymousObject.cs	17.85% <0.00%> (+14.28%)	⬆️
... and 1 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bfd674d...7158c00. Read the comment docs.

[yallie]

Hi Mikel, looks great! 👍
Is it ready for merging?

[mikel785]

Hello, Alexey! Seems ok now, all tests passing and by-default interception performance not changed. I am using both bug fixing and name filtering in production already. Таки будем посмотреть)

Yep it is ready

[yallie]

Great! Thanks a lot :)

[mikel785]

You are welcome 👍