Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add haskell implementation for aquire-repository command #297

Closed
teggotic opened this issue Dec 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Add haskell implementation for aquire-repository command #297

teggotic opened this issue Dec 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@teggotic

Comments

@teggotic
Copy link
Contributor

The original command is in ./libexec/git-elegant-aquire-repository.
@teggotic teggotic self-assigned this Dec 25, 2022
This was referenced Dec 25, 2022
Open
Closed
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2023
@teggotic
Implement acquire repository command
bd1e99b 
Port `git-elegant-acquire-repository` command to haskell.
`unordered-containers` provide HashMap.

#297
@teggotic teggotic mentioned this issue Feb 7, 2023
Merged
4 tasks
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2023
@teggotic
Implement acquire repository command
d48eb9c 
Port `git-elegant-acquire-repository` command to haskell.
`unordered-containers` provide HashMap.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2023
@teggotic
Implement acquire repository command
1316660 
Port `git-elegant-acquire-repository` command to haskell.
`unordered-containers` provide HashMap.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2023
@teggotic
Implement acquire repository command
3fda7dc 
Port `git-elegant-acquire-repository` command to haskell.
`unordered-containers` provide HashMap.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2023
@teggotic
Implement acquire repository command
df26a61 
Port `git-elegant-acquire-repository` command to haskell.
`unordered-containers` provide HashMap.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2023
@teggotic
Implement acquire repository command
db028fc 
Port `git-elegant-acquire-repository` command to haskell.
`unordered-containers` provide HashMap.

#297
extsoft pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2023
@teggotic @extsoft
Implement acquire repository command
8abd477 
Port `git-elegant-acquire-repository` command to haskell.
`unordered-containers` provide HashMap.

#297
@extsoft
Copy link
Contributor

extsoft commented Feb 19, 2023

@teggotic the GPG logic is still pending.

teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2023
@teggotic
AcquireRepository will configure gpg signature
bf4ef2a 
Port gpg signature logic from bash implementation.

#297
@teggotic teggotic mentioned this issue Mar 4, 2023
Merged
@teggotic
Copy link
Contributor Author

teggotic commented Mar 5, 2023

@extsoft I'd like you to merge #300 first, as it improves testability and resolves an issue with the already merged aliases setup logic.

teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2023
@teggotic
AcquireRepository will configure gpg signature
a144580 
Port gpg signature logic from bash implementation.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2023
@teggotic
Implement type command to get gpg path
f0d7c9c 
`type` command is only available as the shell command which means that
we can't use `proc`. This means we should use `shell` instead.
However, using `shell` is not safe, and escaping is needed to make sure
args are mungled. This is the reason why I use `shell` only for `type`
command and `proc` for everything else.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2023
@teggotic
Implement type command to get gpg path
af0b5a5 
`type` command is only available as the shell command which means that
we can't use `proc`. This means we should use `shell` instead.
However, using `shell` is not safe, and escaping is needed to make sure
args are mungled. This is the reason why I use `shell` only for `type`
command and `proc` for everything else.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2023
@teggotic
Implement type command to get gpg path
f795a5a 
`type` command is only available as the shell command which means that
we can't use `proc`. This means we should use `shell` instead.
However, using `shell` is not safe, and escaping is needed to make sure
args are mungled. This is the reason why I use `shell` only for `type`
command and `proc` for everything else.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2023
@teggotic
Implement type command to get gpg path
d09a2c0 
`type` command is only available as the shell command which means that
we can't use `proc`. This means we should use `shell` instead.
However, using `shell` is not safe, and escaping is needed to make sure
args are mungled. This is the reason why I use `shell` only for `type`
command and `proc` for everything else.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2023
@teggotic
Implement type command to get gpg path
9165e6f 
`type` command is only available as the shell command which means that
we can't use `proc`. This means we should use `shell` instead.
However, using `shell` is not safe, and escaping is needed to make sure
args are mungled. This is the reason why I use `shell` only for `type`
command and `proc` for everything else.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2023
@teggotic
AcquireRepository will configure gpg signature
edf84d3 
Port gpg signature logic from bash implementation.

#297
teggotic added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2023
@teggotic
Implement type command to get gpg path
7eceabc 
`type` command is only available as the shell command which means that
we can't use `proc`. This means we should use `shell` instead.
However, using `shell` is not safe, and escaping is needed to make sure
args are mungled. This is the reason why I use `shell` only for `type`
command and `proc` for everything else.

#297
@extsoft extsoft closed this as completed Apr 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@teggotic teggotic

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@extsoft @teggotic