Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Volatile tasks review [VS-447] #7880

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Jun 8, 2022
Merged

Conversation

mcovarr
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcovarr mcovarr commented Jun 2, 2022

Draft PR for mobbing discussion Ready for review, integration tested here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 2, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (ah_var_store@b48282e). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             ah_var_store     #7880   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                ?   86.290%           
  Complexity              ?     35190           
================================================
  Files                   ?      2170           
  Lines                   ?    164888           
  Branches                ?     17786           
================================================
  Hits                    ?    142282           
  Misses                  ?     16281           
  Partials                ?      6325           

@mcovarr mcovarr force-pushed the vs_447_volatile_tasks_review branch 2 times, most recently from 7498550 to 4ec9b34 Compare June 3, 2022 17:53
Base automatically changed from rsa_skip_samples to ah_var_store June 3, 2022 18:51
@mcovarr mcovarr force-pushed the vs_447_volatile_tasks_review branch from 533d0fa to 12eb7a1 Compare June 6, 2022 11:23
@mcovarr mcovarr marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2022 15:38
@mcovarr mcovarr requested a review from rsasch June 6, 2022 15:38
Copy link

@rsasch rsasch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍🏻

fq_sample_table = fq_sample_table,
sample_table_timestamp = SamplesTableDatetimeCheck.last_modified_timestamp,
intervals = SplitIntervals.interval_files[i],
fq_alt_allele_table = fq_alt_allele_table,
Copy link
Contributor

@RoriCremer RoriCremer Jun 8, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not in the scope of this pr, but why do we need the fq alt allele table if we know the project and dataset? will alt allele tables ever be somewhere else?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure. This code is quite old by GVS standards (> 1.5 years), assumptions may have been different back then?

@mcovarr mcovarr merged commit db90162 into ah_var_store Jun 8, 2022
@mcovarr mcovarr deleted the vs_447_volatile_tasks_review branch June 8, 2022 22:28
This was referenced Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants