-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 587
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Volatile tasks review [VS-447] #7880
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## ah_var_store #7880 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 86.290%
Complexity ? 35190
================================================
Files ? 2170
Lines ? 164888
Branches ? 17786
================================================
Hits ? 142282
Misses ? 16281
Partials ? 6325 |
7498550
to
4ec9b34
Compare
533d0fa
to
12eb7a1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍🏻
fq_sample_table = fq_sample_table, | ||
sample_table_timestamp = SamplesTableDatetimeCheck.last_modified_timestamp, | ||
intervals = SplitIntervals.interval_files[i], | ||
fq_alt_allele_table = fq_alt_allele_table, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not in the scope of this pr, but why do we need the fq alt allele table if we know the project and dataset? will alt allele tables ever be somewhere else?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure. This code is quite old by GVS standards (> 1.5 years), assumptions may have been different back then?
Draft PR for mobbing discussionReady for review, integration tested here.