Fixed bug in #169

[GeoDerp]

Related to, and possible fix for issue: davidusb-geek/emhass-add-on#74

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.61111% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.75%. Comparing base (c9686cd) to head (910c26d).
Report is 158 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 910c26d differs from pull request most recent head 682a1d7. Consider uploading reports for the commit 682a1d7 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/emhass/utils.py	98.61%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #181       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   73.21%   87.75%   +14.53%     
===========================================
  Files           7        6        -1     
  Lines        2035     1707      -328     
===========================================
+ Hits         1490     1498        +8     
+ Misses        545      209      -336     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[davidusb-geek]

This PR reinstates the associations list and dict and solves the issue that arised when we released this method. Is that right?

[GeoDerp]

In theory yes 👍

[GeoDerp]

This PR will need to be tested to see if its still functional and dosn't generate any bugs.

[davidusb-geek]

This PR will need to be tested to see if its still functional and dosn't generate any bugs.

Ok, we will probably integrate this in a future 0.9.0 release along with the new MLRegression class.
But yes will need to be tested.

Also requirements_addon.txt file is no longer needed right?

[GeoDerp]

This PR will need to be tested to see if its still functional and dosn't generate any bugs.

Ok, we will probably integrate this in a future 0.9.0 release along with the new MLRegression class.
But yes will need to be tested.

Also requirements_addon.txt file is no longer needed right?

Oh sorry. Yeah I don't believe so.
Does the web server requirements only being used for the devcontainer? If so, could that be removed also. (replaced with manual run pip installs?)

[GeoDerp]

It may be good to keep the web server requirements if you want to specify the version of flask, waitress and ploty. I'll change the Docker to use the file if that's the case? @davidusb-geek

[davidusb-geek]

It may be good to keep the web server requirements if you want to specify the version of flask, waitress and ploty. I'll change the Docker to use the file if that's the case? @davidusb-geek

Yes we will keep the web server requirements and erase the other requirements_addon file

[GeoDerp]

It may be good to keep the web server requirements if you want to specify the version of flask, waitress and ploty. I'll change the Docker to use the file if that's the case? @davidusb-geek

Yes we will keep the web server requirements and erase the other requirements_addon file

Making a PR now.