build.sh and README.md updates #48

lkilo · 2018-11-05T18:33:01Z

Updated some small things in built.sh and README.md.

Increase kasan instrumented kernel stack size from 32k to 64k. Other architectures seems to get away with just doubling kernel stack size under kasan, but on s390 this appears to be not enough due to bigger frame size. The particular pain point is kasan inlined checks (CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE vs CONFIG_KASAN_OUTLINE). With inlined checks one particular case hitting stack overflow is fs sync on xfs filesystem: #0 [9a0681e8] 704 bytes check_usage at 34b1fc #1 [9a0684a8] 432 bytes check_usage at 34c710 #2 [9a068658] 1048 bytes validate_chain at 35044a #3 [9a068a70] 312 bytes __lock_acquire at 3559fe #4 [9a068ba8] 440 bytes lock_acquire at 3576ee #5 [9a068d60] 104 bytes _raw_spin_lock at 21b44e0 #6 [9a068dc8] 1992 bytes enqueue_entity at 2dbf72 #7 [9a069590] 1496 bytes enqueue_task_fair at 2df5f0 #8 [9a069b68] 64 bytes ttwu_do_activate at 28f438 #9 [9a069ba8] 552 bytes try_to_wake_up at 298c4c #10 [9a069dd0] 168 bytes wake_up_worker at 23f97c #11 [9a069e78] 200 bytes insert_work at 23fc2e #12 [9a069f40] 648 bytes __queue_work at 2487c0 #13 [9a06a1c8] 200 bytes __queue_delayed_work at 24db28 #14 [9a06a290] 248 bytes mod_delayed_work_on at 24de84 #15 [9a06a388] 24 bytes kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on at 153e2a0 #16 [9a06a3a0] 288 bytes __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue at 158168c #17 [9a06a4c0] 192 bytes blk_mq_run_hw_queue at 1581a3c #18 [9a06a580] 184 bytes blk_mq_sched_insert_requests at 15a2192 #19 [9a06a638] 1024 bytes blk_mq_flush_plug_list at 1590f3a #20 [9a06aa38] 704 bytes blk_flush_plug_list at 1555028 #21 [9a06acf8] 320 bytes schedule at 219e476 #22 [9a06ae38] 760 bytes schedule_timeout at 21b0aac #23 [9a06b130] 408 bytes wait_for_common at 21a1706 #24 [9a06b2c8] 360 bytes xfs_buf_iowait at fa1540 #25 [9a06b430] 256 bytes __xfs_buf_submit at fadae6 #26 [9a06b530] 264 bytes xfs_buf_read_map at fae3f6 #27 [9a06b638] 656 bytes xfs_trans_read_buf_map at 10ac9a8 #28 [9a06b8c8] 304 bytes xfs_btree_kill_root at e72426 #29 [9a06b9f8] 288 bytes xfs_btree_lookup_get_block at e7bc5e #30 [9a06bb18] 624 bytes xfs_btree_lookup at e7e1a6 #31 [9a06bd88] 2664 bytes xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near at dfa070 #32 [9a06c7f0] 144 bytes xfs_alloc_ag_vextent at dff3ca #33 [9a06c880] 1128 bytes xfs_alloc_vextent at e05fce #34 [9a06cce8] 584 bytes xfs_bmap_btalloc at e58342 #35 [9a06cf30] 1336 bytes xfs_bmapi_write at e618de #36 [9a06d468] 776 bytes xfs_iomap_write_allocate at ff678e #37 [9a06d770] 720 bytes xfs_map_blocks at f82af8 #38 [9a06da40] 928 bytes xfs_writepage_map at f83cd6 #39 [9a06dde0] 320 bytes xfs_do_writepage at f85872 #40 [9a06df20] 1320 bytes write_cache_pages at 73dfe8 #41 [9a06e448] 208 bytes xfs_vm_writepages at f7f892 #42 [9a06e518] 88 bytes do_writepages at 73fe6a #43 [9a06e570] 872 bytes __writeback_single_inode at a20cb6 #44 [9a06e8d8] 664 bytes writeback_sb_inodes at a23be2 #45 [9a06eb70] 296 bytes __writeback_inodes_wb at a242e0 #46 [9a06ec98] 928 bytes wb_writeback at a2500e #47 [9a06f038] 848 bytes wb_do_writeback at a260ae #48 [9a06f388] 536 bytes wb_workfn at a28228 #49 [9a06f5a0] 1088 bytes process_one_work at 24a234 #50 [9a06f9e0] 1120 bytes worker_thread at 24ba26 #51 [9a06fe40] 104 bytes kthread at 26545a #52 [9a06fea8] kernel_thread_starter at 21b6b62 To be able to increase the stack size to 64k reuse LLILL instruction in __switch_to function to load 64k - STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD - __PT_SIZE (65192) value as unsigned. Reported-by: Benjamin Block <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>

After commit 3c83dd5 ("wlcore: Add support for optional wakeirq") landed upstream, I started seeing the following oops on my HiKey board: [ 1.870279] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 0000000000000010 [ 1.870283] Mem abort info: [ 1.870287] ESR = 0x96000005 [ 1.870292] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 1.870296] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 1.870299] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 1.870302] Data abort info: [ 1.870306] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005 [ 1.870309] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 1.870312] [0000000000000010] user address but active_mm is swapper [ 1.870318] Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 1.870327] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.19.0-05129-gb3d1e8e #48 [ 1.870331] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT) [ 1.870350] Workqueue: events_freezable mmc_rescan [ 1.870358] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO) [ 1.870366] pc : wl1271_probe+0x210/0x350 [ 1.870371] lr : wl1271_probe+0x210/0x350 [ 1.870374] sp : ffffff80080739b0 [ 1.870377] x29: ffffff80080739b0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 1.870384] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 1.870391] x25: 0000000000000036 x24: ffffffc074ecb598 [ 1.870398] x23: ffffffc07ffdce78 x22: ffffffc0744ed808 [ 1.870404] x21: ffffffc074ecbb98 x20: ffffff8008ff9000 [ 1.870411] x19: ffffffc0744ed800 x18: ffffff8008ff9a48 [ 1.870418] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 1.870425] x15: ffffffc074ecb503 x14: ffffffffffffffff [ 1.870431] x13: ffffffc074ecb502 x12: 0000000000000030 [ 1.870438] x11: 0101010101010101 x10: 0000000000000040 [ 1.870444] x9 : ffffffc075400248 x8 : ffffffc075400270 [ 1.870451] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 1.870457] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 1.870463] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 [ 1.870469] x1 : 0000000000000028 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 1.870477] Process kworker/0:0 (pid: 5, stack limit = 0x(____ptrval____)) [ 1.870480] Call trace: [ 1.870485] wl1271_probe+0x210/0x350 [ 1.870491] sdio_bus_probe+0x100/0x128 [ 1.870500] really_probe+0x1a8/0x2b8 [ 1.870506] driver_probe_device+0x58/0x100 [ 1.870511] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0xd8 [ 1.870517] bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8 [ 1.870522] __device_attach+0xe0/0x140 [ 1.870527] device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18 [ 1.870532] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0 [ 1.870537] device_add+0x374/0x5b8 [ 1.870542] sdio_add_func+0x60/0x88 [ 1.870546] mmc_attach_sdio+0x1b0/0x358 [ 1.870551] mmc_rescan+0x2cc/0x390 [ 1.870558] process_one_work+0x12c/0x320 [ 1.870563] worker_thread+0x48/0x458 [ 1.870569] kthread+0xf8/0x128 [ 1.870575] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [ 1.870583] Code: 92400c21 b2760021 a90687a2 97e95bf9 (f9400803) [ 1.870587] ---[ end trace 1e15f81d3c139ca9 ]--- It seems since we don't have a wakeirq value in the dts, the wakeirq value in wl1271_probe() is zero, which then causes trouble in irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_get_irq_data(wakeirq)). This patch tries to address this by checking if wakeirq is zero, and not trying to add it to the resources if that is the case. Fixes: 3c83dd5 ("wlcore: Add support for optional wakeirq") Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> Cc: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Cc: Eyal Reizer <[email protected]> Cc: Anders Roxell <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>

…f fs_info::journal_info [BUG] One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_internal#2); lock(sb_internal#2); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7: #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214 lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210 __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290 start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs] btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x632/0xb80 worker_thread+0x80/0x690 kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far. [CAUSE] This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using the current running one: btrfs_finish_ordered_io() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #1 |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans() |- btrfs_reserve_extent() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #2 Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing one, without trying to re-start a transaction. But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info. And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock. [FIX] Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized current::journal_info. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit dd09fad ] Commit: 3a6b6c6 ("efi: Make EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE initialization common across all architectures") moved the call to efi_memattr_init() from ARM specific to the generic EFI init code, in order to be able to apply the restricted permissions described in that table on x86 as well. We never enabled this feature fully on i386, and so mapping and reserving this table is pointless. However, due to the early call to memblock_reserve(), the memory bookkeeping gets confused to the point where it produces the splat below when we try to map the memory later on: ------------[ cut here ]------------ ioremap on RAM at 0x3f251000 - 0x3fa1afff WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:166 __ioremap_caller ... Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.20.0 #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 EIP: __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x249/0x260 Code: 90 0f b7 05 4e 38 40 de 09 45 e0 e9 09 ff ff ff 90 8d 45 ec c6 05 ... EAX: 00000029 EBX: 00000000 ECX: de59c228 EDX: 00000001 ESI: 3f250fff EDI: 00000000 EBP: de3edf20 ESP: de3edee0 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00200296 CR0: 80050033 CR2: ffd17000 CR3: 1e58c000 CR4: 00040690 Call Trace: ioremap_cache+0xd/0x10 ? old_map_region+0x72/0x9d old_map_region+0x72/0x9d efi_map_region+0x8/0xa efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x260/0x43b start_kernel+0x329/0x3aa i386_start_kernel+0xa7/0xab startup_32_smp+0x164/0x168 ---[ end trace e15ccf6b9f356833 ]--- Let's work around this by disregarding the memory attributes table altogether on i386, which does not result in a loss of functionality or protection, given that we never consumed the contents. Fixes: 3a6b6c6 ("efi: Make EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE ... ") Tested-by: Arvind Sankar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…f fs_info::journal_info commit fcc9973 upstream. [BUG] One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_internal#2); lock(sb_internal#2); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7: #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214 lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210 __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290 start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs] btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x632/0xb80 worker_thread+0x80/0x690 kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far. [CAUSE] This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using the current running one: btrfs_finish_ordered_io() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #1 |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans() |- btrfs_reserve_extent() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #2 Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing one, without trying to re-start a transaction. But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info. And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock. [FIX] Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized current::journal_info. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit dd09fad ] Commit: 3a6b6c6 ("efi: Make EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE initialization common across all architectures") moved the call to efi_memattr_init() from ARM specific to the generic EFI init code, in order to be able to apply the restricted permissions described in that table on x86 as well. We never enabled this feature fully on i386, and so mapping and reserving this table is pointless. However, due to the early call to memblock_reserve(), the memory bookkeeping gets confused to the point where it produces the splat below when we try to map the memory later on: ------------[ cut here ]------------ ioremap on RAM at 0x3f251000 - 0x3fa1afff WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:166 __ioremap_caller ... Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.20.0 #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 EIP: __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x249/0x260 Code: 90 0f b7 05 4e 38 40 de 09 45 e0 e9 09 ff ff ff 90 8d 45 ec c6 05 ... EAX: 00000029 EBX: 00000000 ECX: de59c228 EDX: 00000001 ESI: 3f250fff EDI: 00000000 EBP: de3edf20 ESP: de3edee0 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00200296 CR0: 80050033 CR2: ffd17000 CR3: 1e58c000 CR4: 00040690 Call Trace: ioremap_cache+0xd/0x10 ? old_map_region+0x72/0x9d old_map_region+0x72/0x9d efi_map_region+0x8/0xa efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x260/0x43b start_kernel+0x329/0x3aa i386_start_kernel+0xa7/0xab startup_32_smp+0x164/0x168 ---[ end trace e15ccf6b9f356833 ]--- Let's work around this by disregarding the memory attributes table altogether on i386, which does not result in a loss of functionality or protection, given that we never consumed the contents. Fixes: 3a6b6c6 ("efi: Make EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE ... ") Tested-by: Arvind Sankar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…f fs_info::journal_info commit fcc9973 upstream. [BUG] One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_internal#2); lock(sb_internal#2); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7: #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214 lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210 __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290 start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs] btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x632/0xb80 worker_thread+0x80/0x690 kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far. [CAUSE] This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using the current running one: btrfs_finish_ordered_io() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #1 |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans() |- btrfs_reserve_extent() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #2 Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing one, without trying to re-start a transaction. But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info. And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock. [FIX] Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized current::journal_info. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

I got null-ptr-deref in serial8250_start_tx(): [ 78.114630] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ 78.123778] Mem abort info: [ 78.126560] ESR = 0x86000007 [ 78.129603] EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 78.134891] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 78.137933] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 78.141064] user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000027d41a8600 [ 78.147562] [0000000000000000] pgd=00000027893f0003, p4d=00000027893f0003, pud=00000027893f0003, pmd=00000027c9a20003, pte=0000000000000000 [ 78.160029] Internal error: Oops: 86000007 [#1] SMP [ 78.164886] Modules linked in: sunrpc vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce ses enclosure sg sbsa_gwdt ipmi_ssif spi_dw_mmio sch_fq_codel vhost_net tun vhost vhost_iotlb tap ip_tables ext4 mbcache jbd2 ahci hisi_sas_v3_hw libahci hisi_sas_main libsas hns3 scsi_transport_sas hclge libata megaraid_sas ipmi_si hnae3 ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler br_netfilter bridge stp llc nvme nvme_core xt_sctp sctp libcrc32c dm_mod nbd [ 78.207383] CPU: 11 PID: 23258 Comm: null-ptr Not tainted 5.8.0-rc6+ #48 [ 78.214056] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V3.B210.01 03/12/2020 [ 78.222888] pstate: 80400089 (Nzcv daIf +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 78.228435] pc : 0x0 [ 78.230618] lr : serial8250_start_tx+0x160/0x260 [ 78.235215] sp : ffff800062eefb80 [ 78.238517] x29: ffff800062eefb80 x28: 0000000000000fff [ 78.243807] x27: ffff800062eefd80 x26: ffff202fd83b3000 [ 78.249098] x25: ffff800062eefd80 x24: ffff202fd83b3000 [ 78.254388] x23: ffff002fc5e50be8 x22: 0000000000000002 [ 78.259679] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 78.264969] x19: ffffa688827eecc8 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 78.270259] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 78.275550] x15: ffffa68881bc67a8 x14: 00000000000002e6 [ 78.280841] x13: ffffa68881bc67a8 x12: 000000000000c539 [ 78.286131] x11: d37a6f4de9bd37a7 x10: ffffa68881cccff0 [ 78.291421] x9 : ffffa68881bc6000 x8 : ffffa688819daa88 [ 78.296711] x7 : ffffa688822a0f20 x6 : ffffa688819e0000 [ 78.302002] x5 : ffff800062eef9d0 x4 : ffffa68881e707a8 [ 78.307292] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000002 [ 78.312582] x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ffffa688827eecc8 [ 78.317873] Call trace: [ 78.320312] 0x0 [ 78.322147] __uart_start.isra.9+0x64/0x78 [ 78.326229] uart_start+0xb8/0x1c8 [ 78.329620] uart_flush_chars+0x24/0x30 [ 78.333442] n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x7b0/0xc30 [ 78.338128] n_tty_receive_buf+0x44/0x2c8 [ 78.342122] tty_ioctl+0x348/0x11f8 [ 78.345599] ksys_ioctl+0xd8/0xf8 [ 78.348903] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x2c/0xc8 [ 78.352812] el0_svc_common.constprop.2+0x88/0x1b0 [ 78.357583] do_el0_svc+0x44/0xd0 [ 78.360887] el0_sync_handler+0x14c/0x1d0 [ 78.364880] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 78.368185] Code: bad PC value SERIAL_PORT_DFNS is not defined on each arch, if it's not defined, serial8250_set_defaults() won't be called in serial8250_isa_init_ports(), so the p->serial_in pointer won't be initialized, and it leads a null-ptr-deref. Fix this problem by calling serial8250_set_defaults() after init uart port. Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]> Cc: stable <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit f4c23a1 upstream. I got null-ptr-deref in serial8250_start_tx(): [ 78.114630] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ 78.123778] Mem abort info: [ 78.126560] ESR = 0x86000007 [ 78.129603] EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 78.134891] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 78.137933] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 78.141064] user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000027d41a8600 [ 78.147562] [0000000000000000] pgd=00000027893f0003, p4d=00000027893f0003, pud=00000027893f0003, pmd=00000027c9a20003, pte=0000000000000000 [ 78.160029] Internal error: Oops: 86000007 [#1] SMP [ 78.164886] Modules linked in: sunrpc vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce ses enclosure sg sbsa_gwdt ipmi_ssif spi_dw_mmio sch_fq_codel vhost_net tun vhost vhost_iotlb tap ip_tables ext4 mbcache jbd2 ahci hisi_sas_v3_hw libahci hisi_sas_main libsas hns3 scsi_transport_sas hclge libata megaraid_sas ipmi_si hnae3 ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler br_netfilter bridge stp llc nvme nvme_core xt_sctp sctp libcrc32c dm_mod nbd [ 78.207383] CPU: 11 PID: 23258 Comm: null-ptr Not tainted 5.8.0-rc6+ #48 [ 78.214056] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V3.B210.01 03/12/2020 [ 78.222888] pstate: 80400089 (Nzcv daIf +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 78.228435] pc : 0x0 [ 78.230618] lr : serial8250_start_tx+0x160/0x260 [ 78.235215] sp : ffff800062eefb80 [ 78.238517] x29: ffff800062eefb80 x28: 0000000000000fff [ 78.243807] x27: ffff800062eefd80 x26: ffff202fd83b3000 [ 78.249098] x25: ffff800062eefd80 x24: ffff202fd83b3000 [ 78.254388] x23: ffff002fc5e50be8 x22: 0000000000000002 [ 78.259679] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 78.264969] x19: ffffa688827eecc8 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 78.270259] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 78.275550] x15: ffffa68881bc67a8 x14: 00000000000002e6 [ 78.280841] x13: ffffa68881bc67a8 x12: 000000000000c539 [ 78.286131] x11: d37a6f4de9bd37a7 x10: ffffa68881cccff0 [ 78.291421] x9 : ffffa68881bc6000 x8 : ffffa688819daa88 [ 78.296711] x7 : ffffa688822a0f20 x6 : ffffa688819e0000 [ 78.302002] x5 : ffff800062eef9d0 x4 : ffffa68881e707a8 [ 78.307292] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000002 [ 78.312582] x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ffffa688827eecc8 [ 78.317873] Call trace: [ 78.320312] 0x0 [ 78.322147] __uart_start.isra.9+0x64/0x78 [ 78.326229] uart_start+0xb8/0x1c8 [ 78.329620] uart_flush_chars+0x24/0x30 [ 78.333442] n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x7b0/0xc30 [ 78.338128] n_tty_receive_buf+0x44/0x2c8 [ 78.342122] tty_ioctl+0x348/0x11f8 [ 78.345599] ksys_ioctl+0xd8/0xf8 [ 78.348903] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x2c/0xc8 [ 78.352812] el0_svc_common.constprop.2+0x88/0x1b0 [ 78.357583] do_el0_svc+0x44/0xd0 [ 78.360887] el0_sync_handler+0x14c/0x1d0 [ 78.364880] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 78.368185] Code: bad PC value SERIAL_PORT_DFNS is not defined on each arch, if it's not defined, serial8250_set_defaults() won't be called in serial8250_isa_init_ports(), so the p->serial_in pointer won't be initialized, and it leads a null-ptr-deref. Fix this problem by calling serial8250_set_defaults() after init uart port. Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]> Cc: stable <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit d5027ca ] Ritesh reported a bug [1] against UML, noting that it crashed on startup. The backtrace shows the following (heavily redacted): (gdb) bt ... #26 0x0000000060015b5d in sem_init () at ipc/sem.c:268 #27 0x00007f89906d92f7 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcom_err.so.2 #28 0x00007f8990ab8fb2 in call_init (...) at dl-init.c:72 ... #40 0x00007f89909bf3a6 in nss_load_library (...) at nsswitch.c:359 ... #44 0x00007f8990895e35 in _nss_compat_getgrnam_r (...) at nss_compat/compat-grp.c:486 #45 0x00007f8990968b85 in __getgrnam_r [...] #46 0x00007f89909d6b77 in grantpt [...] #47 0x00007f8990a9394e in __GI_openpty [...] #48 0x00000000604a1f65 in openpty_cb (...) at arch/um/os-Linux/sigio.c:407 #49 0x00000000604a58d0 in start_idle_thread (...) at arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:598 #50 0x0000000060004a3d in start_uml () at arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c:45 #51 0x00000000600047b2 in linux_main (...) at arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c:334 #52 0x000000006000574f in main (...) at arch/um/os-Linux/main.c:144 indicating that the UML function openpty_cb() calls openpty(), which internally calls __getgrnam_r(), which causes the nsswitch machinery to get started. This loads, through lots of indirection that I snipped, the libcom_err.so.2 library, which (in an unknown function, "??") calls sem_init(). Now, of course it wants to get libpthread's sem_init(), since it's linked against libpthread. However, the dynamic linker looks up that symbol against the binary first, and gets the kernel's sem_init(). Hajime Tazaki noted that "objcopy -L" can localize a symbol, so the dynamic linker wouldn't do the lookup this way. I tried, but for some reason that didn't seem to work. Doing the same thing in the linker script instead does seem to work, though I cannot entirely explain - it *also* works if I just add "VERSION { { global: *; }; }" instead, indicating that something else is happening that I don't really understand. It may be that explicitly doing that marks them with some kind of empty version, and that's different from the default. Explicitly marking them with a version breaks kallsyms, so that doesn't seem to be possible. Marking all the symbols as local seems correct, and does seem to address the issue, so do that. Also do it for static link, nsswitch libraries could still be loaded there. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/983379 Reported-by: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Acked-By: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> Tested-By: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

nft_set_elem_expr_alloc() needs an initialized set if expression sets on the NFT_EXPR_GC flag. Move set fields initialization before expression setup. [4512935.019450] ================================================================== [4512935.019456] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019487] Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000070 by task nft/23532 [4512935.019494] CPU: 1 PID: 23532 Comm: nft Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ #48 [...] [4512935.019502] Call Trace: [4512935.019505] dump_stack+0x89/0xb4 [4512935.019512] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019536] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019560] kasan_report.cold.12+0x5f/0xd8 [4512935.019566] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019590] nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019615] nf_tables_newset+0xc7f/0x1460 [nf_tables] Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: 6503842 ("netfilter: nf_tables: allow to specify stateful expression in set definition") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>

commit ad9f151 upstream. nft_set_elem_expr_alloc() needs an initialized set if expression sets on the NFT_EXPR_GC flag. Move set fields initialization before expression setup. [4512935.019450] ================================================================== [4512935.019456] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019487] Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000070 by task nft/23532 [4512935.019494] CPU: 1 PID: 23532 Comm: nft Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ #48 [...] [4512935.019502] Call Trace: [4512935.019505] dump_stack+0x89/0xb4 [4512935.019512] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019536] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019560] kasan_report.cold.12+0x5f/0xd8 [4512935.019566] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019590] nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019615] nf_tables_newset+0xc7f/0x1460 [nf_tables] Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: 6503842 ("netfilter: nf_tables: allow to specify stateful expression in set definition") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

syzbot detected a case where the page table counters were not properly updated. syzkaller login: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:162! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 3099 Comm: pasha Not tainted 5.16.0+ #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIO4 RIP: 0010:__page_table_check_zero+0x159/0x1a0 Call Trace: free_pcp_prepare+0x3be/0xaa0 free_unref_page+0x1c/0x650 free_compound_page+0xec/0x130 free_transhuge_page+0x1be/0x260 __put_compound_page+0x90/0xd0 release_pages+0x54c/0x1060 __pagevec_release+0x7c/0x110 shmem_undo_range+0x85e/0x1250 ... The repro involved having a huge page that is split due to uprobe event temporarily replacing one of the pages in the huge page. Later the huge page was combined again, but the counters were off, as the PTE level was not properly updated. Make sure that when PMD is cleared and prior to freeing the level the PTEs are updated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: df4e817 ("mm: page table check") Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Greg Thelen <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Turner <[email protected]> Cc: Wei Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Zi Yan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Occasionally, with './test_progs -j' on my vm, I will hit the following failure: test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:iter_create 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL:cgroup_id unexpected cgroup_id: actual 1 != expected 2812 #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL Finally, I decided to do some investigation since the test is introduced by myself. It turns out the reason is due to cgroup_fd with value 0. In cgroup_iter, a cgroup_fd of value 0 means the root cgroup. /* from cgroup_iter.c */ if (fd) cgrp = cgroup_v1v2_get_from_fd(fd); else if (id) cgrp = cgroup_get_from_id(id); else /* walk the entire hierarchy by default. */ cgrp = cgroup_get_from_path("/"); That is why we got cgroup_id 1 instead of expected 2812. Why we got a cgroup_fd 0? Nobody should really touch 'stdin' (fd 0) in test_progs. I traced 'close' syscall with stack trace and found the root cause, which is a bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c. Basically, the code closed fd 0 although it should not. Fixing the bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c also resolved the above cgroup_iter_sleepable subtest failure. Fixes: 3b22f98 ("selftests/bpf: Add path_fd-based BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET tests") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

[ Upstream commit fe57575 ] The `cgrp_local_storage` test triggers a kernel panic like: # ./test_progs -t cgrp_local_storage Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2 WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped. [ 550.930632] CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000080, era == ffff80000200be34, ra == ffff80000200be00 [ 550.931781] Oops[#1]: [ 550.931966] CPU: 1 PID: 1303 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-loong-devel-g2f56bb0d2327 #35 a896aca3f4164f09cc346f89f2e09832e07be5f6 [ 550.932215] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 [ 550.932403] pc ffff80000200be34 ra ffff80000200be00 tp 9000000108350000 sp 9000000108353dc0 [ 550.932545] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000517 a2 0000000000000118 a3 00007ffffbb15558 [ 550.932682] a4 00007ffffbb15620 a5 90000001004e7700 a6 0000000000000021 a7 0000000000000118 [ 550.932824] t0 ffff80000200bdc0 t1 0000000000000517 t2 0000000000000517 t3 00007ffff1c06ee0 [ 550.932961] t4 0000555578ae04d0 t5 fffffffffffffff8 t6 0000000000000004 t7 0000000000000020 [ 550.933097] t8 0000000000000040 u0 00000000000007b8 s9 9000000108353e00 s0 90000001004e7700 [ 550.933241] s1 9000000004005000 s2 0000000000000001 s3 0000000000000000 s4 0000555555eb2ec8 [ 550.933379] s5 00007ffffbb15bb8 s6 00007ffff1dafd60 s7 000055555663f610 s8 00007ffff1db0050 [ 550.933520] ra: ffff80000200be00 bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x40/0x200 [ 550.933911] ERA: ffff80000200be34 bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x74/0x200 [ 550.934105] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) [ 550.934596] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) [ 550.934712] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE) [ 550.934836] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7) [ 550.934976] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) [ 550.935097] BADV: 0000000000000080 [ 550.935181] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000) [ 550.935291] Modules linked in: [ 550.935391] Process test_progs (pid: 1303, threadinfo=000000006c3b1c41, task=0000000061f84a55) [ 550.935643] Stack : 00007ffffbb15bb8 0000555555eb2ec8 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [ 550.935844] 9000000004005000 ffff80001b864000 00007ffffbb15450 90000000029aa034 [ 550.935990] 0000000000000000 9000000108353ec0 0000000000000118 d07d9dfb09721a09 [ 550.936175] 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 9000000108353ec0 0000000000000118 [ 550.936314] 9000000101d46ad0 900000000290abf0 000055555663f610 0000000000000000 [ 550.936479] 0000000000000003 9000000108353ec0 00007ffffbb15450 90000000029d7288 [ 550.936635] 00007ffff1dafd60 000055555663f610 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 [ 550.936779] 9000000108353ec0 90000000035dd1f0 00007ffff1dafd58 9000000002841c5c [ 550.936939] 0000000000000119 0000555555eea5a8 00007ffff1d78780 00007ffffbb153e0 [ 550.937083] ffffffffffffffda 00007ffffbb15518 0000000000000040 00007ffffbb15558 [ 550.937224] ... [ 550.937299] Call Trace: [ 550.937521] [<ffff80000200be34>] bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x74/0x200 [ 550.937910] [<90000000029aa034>] bpf_trace_run2+0x90/0x154 [ 550.938105] [<900000000290abf0>] syscall_trace_enter.isra.0+0x1cc/0x200 [ 550.938224] [<90000000035dd1f0>] do_syscall+0x48/0x94 [ 550.938319] [<9000000002841c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158 [ 550.938477] [ 550.938607] Code: 580009ae 50016000 262402e4 <28c20085> 14092084 03a00084 16000024 03240084 00150006 [ 550.938851] [ 550.939021] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Further investigation shows that this panic is triggered by memory load operations: ptr = bpf_cgrp_storage_get(&map_a, task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp, 0, BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); The expression `task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp` involves two memory load. Since the field offset fits in imm12 or imm14, we use ldd or ldptrd instructions. But both instructions have the side effect that it will signed-extended the imm operand. Finally, we got the wrong addresses and panics is inevitable. Use a generic ldxd instruction to avoid this kind of issues. With this change, we have: # ./test_progs -t cgrp_local_storage Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2 WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped. test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec #48/1 cgrp_local_storage/tp_btf:OK test_attach_cgroup:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'update_cookie_tracing': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 test_attach_cgroup:FAIL:prog_attach unexpected error: -524 #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:FAIL test_recursion:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_recursion:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:FAIL #48/4 cgrp_local_storage/negative:OK #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:OK test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_yes_rcu_lock:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:FAIL #48/7 cgrp_local_storage/no_rcu_lock:OK #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL All error logs: test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'update_cookie_tracing': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 test_attach_cgroup:FAIL:prog_attach unexpected error: -524 #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:FAIL test_recursion:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_recursion:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:FAIL test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_yes_rcu_lock:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:FAIL #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL Summary: 0/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED No panics any more (The test still failed because lack of BPF trampoline which I am actively working on). Fixes: 5dc6155 ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support") Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Currently normal HugeTLB fault ends up crashing the kernel, as p4dp derived from p4d_offset() is an invalid address when PGTABLE_LEVEL = 5. A p4d level entry needs to be allocated when not available while walking the page table during HugeTLB faults. Let's call p4d_alloc() to allocate such entries when required instead of current p4d_offset(). Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff80000000 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000005 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 52-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000081da9000 [ffffffff80000000] pgd=1000000082cec003, p4d=0000000082c32003, pud=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 108 Comm: high_addr_hugep Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4 #48 Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT) pstate: 01402005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : huge_pte_alloc+0xd4/0x334 lr : hugetlb_fault+0x1b8/0xc68 sp : ffff8000833bbc20 x29: ffff8000833bbc20 x28: fff000080080cb58 x27: ffff800082a7cc58 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: fff0000800378e40 x24: fff00008008d6c60 x23: 00000000de9dbf07 x22: fff0000800378e40 x21: 0004000000000000 x20: 0004000000000000 x19: ffffffff80000000 x18: 1ffe00010011d7a1 x17: 0000000000000001 x16: ffffffffffffffff x15: 0000000000000001 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff8000816120d0 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: 0000000000000000 x10: fff00008008ebd0c x9 : 0004000000000000 x8 : 0000000000001255 x7 : fff00008003e2000 x6 : 00000000061d54b0 x5 : 0000000000001000 x4 : ffffffff80000000 x3 : 0000000000200000 x2 : 0000000000000004 x1 : 0000000080000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: huge_pte_alloc+0xd4/0x334 hugetlb_fault+0x1b8/0xc68 handle_mm_fault+0x260/0x29c do_page_fault+0xfc/0x47c do_translation_fault+0x68/0x74 do_mem_abort+0x44/0x94 el0_da+0x2c/0x9c el0t_64_sync_handler+0x70/0xc4 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 Code: aa000084 cb010084 b24c2c84 8b130c93 (f9400260) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> Cc: Ryan Roberts <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Fixes: a6bbf5d ("arm64: mm: Add definitions to support 5 levels of paging") Reported-by: Dev Jain <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

lkilo added 4 commits November 2, 2018 00:43

Updated build.sh user "interface"

c3fff6a

Some small spelling changes; Using apt instead of apt-get

d22dce8

Syntax error fixed in README.md

fcd57b1

Small simplifications

c96a502

frank-w merged commit 7d3facd into frank-w:4.14-main Nov 5, 2018

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

build.sh and README.md updates #48

build.sh and README.md updates #48

lkilo commented Nov 5, 2018

build.sh and README.md updates #48

build.sh and README.md updates #48

Conversation

lkilo commented Nov 5, 2018