Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: improve test coverage to 80% #405

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

JeyJeyGao
Copy link
Contributor

@JeyJeyGao JeyJeyGao commented May 23, 2024

Test:

  • improved test coverage to over 80.16%

Fix:

  • added ORAS copy library to copy the OCI Layout test data to a temporary directory and avoid generating test time temporary files in the repository directory.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.15%. Comparing base (9ff1891) to head (39452a5).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #405      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.43%   80.15%   +6.72%     
==========================================
  Files          24       31       +7     
  Lines        2507     2172     -335     
==========================================
- Hits         1841     1741     -100     
+ Misses        526      302     -224     
+ Partials      140      129      -11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Junjie Gao <[email protected]>
@JeyJeyGao JeyJeyGao changed the title test: improve test coverage test: improve test coverage to 80% May 23, 2024
Signed-off-by: Junjie Gao <[email protected]>
@JeyJeyGao JeyJeyGao closed this May 24, 2024
@JeyJeyGao JeyJeyGao reopened this May 24, 2024
@JeyJeyGao JeyJeyGao changed the title test: improve test coverage to 80% test: improve test coverage to 80.16% May 24, 2024
@JeyJeyGao JeyJeyGao changed the title test: improve test coverage to 80.16% test: improve test coverage to 80% May 24, 2024
.gitignore Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Junjie Gao <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@Two-Hearts Two-Hearts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@priteshbandi priteshbandi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@priteshbandi priteshbandi merged commit b8508d0 into notaryproject:main May 28, 2024
9 checks passed
JeyJeyGao added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
Test:
- improved test coverage to over 80.16%

Fix:
- added ORAS copy library to copy the OCI Layout test data to a
temporary directory and avoid generating test time temporary files in
the repository directory.

---------

Signed-off-by: Junjie Gao <[email protected]>
@JeyJeyGao JeyJeyGao mentioned this pull request May 29, 2024
6 tasks
JeyJeyGao added a commit to JeyJeyGao/notation-go that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
JeyJeyGao added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
Revert:
- reverted #379 
- reverted test cases: `TestSignOptsMissingSignatureMediaType` and
`TestSignOptsUnknownMediaType`, introduced in #405

Test:
- added test for `log` package to pass 80% coverage target

This reverts commit ec42378.


Resolves part of #412 
Signed-off-by: Junjie Gao <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Junjie Gao [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Junjie Gao <[email protected]>
@Two-Hearts Two-Hearts mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants