-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve description field in Policy to require more human readable details #786
Conversation
New examples for Policy with agreed upon rule types - updated by Justin Yeo after discussion with Jean Kao
Thanks @jyeo17 ! Could you resolve the conflicts with |
@schnuerle thanks for going through it! I have completed them. |
policy/examples/README.md
Outdated
] | ||
} | ||
|
||
Still to be decided upon |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you write this "No Riding" policy example based on what you and @jean-populus think is best?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes we will do @schnuerle
Currently the PR has these examples defined:
and in the planning doc we collectively listed these use cases:
Which leaves these use cases not yet addressed.
And these two which I don't think are covered by just 'Parking':
Do you think you could add these now? @jyeo17 @S-eb @jean-populus If not we could do it in a future pull request, and I'd like to capture that in issue #764 as a comment. |
The decision was taken at the task force level to tackle only the policies where Therefore the short list for the following policies: Operating Area
This has been validated by the WG steering committee. The decision was also taken to not consider fees as part of the policy taskforce. Thanks Seb |
Just a note, Tiered Parking Fees was not part of the discussion and so has been removed. We have:
|
"available": [], | ||
"non_operational": [], | ||
"reserved": [], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jyeo17 as per how I understood your comment, no riding should not be restricted to the state on_trip
, shouldn't it?
You can count vehicles that are on_trip to count the process of riding. This works in most cases as trip telemetry and speed isn't usually measured in real-time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the"on_trip": []
state listed here needed, or should it be removed @jyeo17 @jean-populus @S-eb?
After the discussion in the working group,
|
For each of the 8 examples, could you either 1) update the full JSON file examples that appear in this directory or 2) remove the link to the full file for each example and delete the JSON files in the directory? |
looks good to me (once @schnuerle's ask is addressed) |
Merging this to dev so we can consolidate all the work from task forces and other open PRs. |
New examples for Policy with agreed upon rule types - updated by Justin Yeo after discussion with Jean Kao
name: Improve description field description in Policy to require more human readable details
about: Suggest changes to MDS
title: Improve description field description in Policy to require more human readable details
MDS Pull Request
Thank you for your contribution! Please review our OMF contributing page to understand guidelines and policies for participation, and our Code of Conduct page.
To avoid complications and help make the Review process as smooth as possible, make sure to:
dev
branch. Please ensure you are targetingdev
, notmain
.Explain pull request
Improve description field description in Policy to require more human readable details
Is this a breaking change
Impacted Spec
Which spec(s) will this pull request impact?
policy
Additional context
Issue from #764
Decided upon in https://github.com/openmobilityfoundation/mobility-data-specification/wiki/Web-conference-notes,-2022.06.23-(MDS-Working-Group)