Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #114492

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Aug 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lcnr and others added 17 commits August 3, 2023 14:16
we previously had incorrect universes in the query response.
update overflow handling in the new trait solver

implements https://hackmd.io/QY0dfEOgSNWwU4oiGnVRLw?view. I want to clean up this doc and add it to the rustc-dev-guide, but I think this PR is ready for merge as is, even without the dev-guide entry.

r? `@compiler-errors`
…lor-27, r=notriddle

Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format

Follow-up of rust-lang#111459.

r? `@notriddle`
Fix ui-fulldeps missing the `internal_features` lint on stage 0

Similar to rust-lang#114102, `ui-fulldeps --stage=1` builds using the the stage 0 compiler instead of the stage 1 compiler. That means that the new `internal_features` lint is referencing a lint that does not exist. Gate the flag it properly until the next feature bump.

Maybe we should just add ui-fulldeps stage 1 into CI somewhere so this is flagged before landing.
…, r=compiler-errors

Fix a typo in the error reporting for sealed traits.

Fixes a typo in error reporting: "implelement" -> "implement"
…114423-test-names, r=compiler-errors

Rename issue rust-lang#114423 test files to include context

Addresses feedback given in rust-lang#114461 (comment)

r? `@estebank`
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Aug 5, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

📌 Commit 3222084 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 5, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 3222084 with merge fca59ab...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 5, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing fca59ab to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 5, 2023
@bors bors merged commit fca59ab into rust-lang:master Aug 5, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#114287 update overflow handling in the new trait solver 72c7f0ec33b0b7dc5d13a562527c6ae4d578125b (link)
#114475 Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format ff0dcdd23dd0dfc515ee23afed4373c31a4d6a79 (link)
#114482 Fix ui-fulldeps missing the internal_features lint on sta… dd9b711018f4950b6d0905355165574deabbdfb2 (link)
#114490 Fix a typo in the error reporting for sealed traits. 6b622ec74d5fd5a39bd190792b63e8e33bd264d0 (link)
#114491 Rename issue #114423 test files to include context 104c3950d5b4834ce46a80b3f9348a392baa01ba (link)

previous master: 90f0b24ad3

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fca59ab): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.0% [-1.4%, -0.4%] 12
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7% [-1.1%, -0.4%] 9
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.9% [-1.4%, 0.3%] 13

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.5% [-2.5%, -2.5%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
14.8% [13.3%, 16.1%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 650.303s -> 650.338s (0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Aug 5, 2023
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Aug 5, 2023

@rust-timer build 72c7f0ec33b0b7dc5d13a562527c6ae4d578125b

(the only thing that comes to mind)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Aug 5, 2023

This PR should be self-contained within the new solver, but we'll see.

tt-muncher check looks like a bump back to steady state. And the hyper doc regression looks possibly "expected" with the rustdoc PR in the rollup.


Unless you're trying to find the source of the wins: in that case I'd think it's just the ripples of the incr comp regression noise we've been seeing in the last few merges.

image

(kinda looks like the top of the batman symbol)

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Aug 5, 2023

I was actually worried about this.

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Aug 5, 2023

Since there's no PR involved in CTFE here, I was thinking it was some noise, like this also happened a couple weeks ago in https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=1c44af9b791c16557b5bf606707bb76df979134a&end=cec34a43b1b14f4e39363f3b283d7ac4f593ee81&stat=cycles:u

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (72c7f0ec33b0b7dc5d13a562527c6ae4d578125b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 4
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 4

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.7% [0.7%, 0.7%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.7% [0.7%, 0.7%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 650.303s -> 649.897s (-0.06%)

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Aug 5, 2023

@lqd good catch, I didn't know that it blipped recently. Given that the perf. run didn't return anything, and the other PRs should be harmless, I think this can be triaged as resolved.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Aug 5, 2023

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Aug 5, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the rollup-lp4sfla branch August 11, 2023 19:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants