Fix licenses

[maltekliemann]

Fixing licenses according to their git changelog. Process was partially automated, partially manual. This needs to be merged before #963.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #964 (0e5af7f) into main (45edad6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #964   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.39%   94.39%           
=======================================
  Files          93       93           
  Lines       21060    21060           
=======================================
  Hits        19880    19880           
  Misses       1180     1180           

Flag	Coverage Δ
tests	94.39% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
primitives/src/asset.rs	41.17% <ø> (ø)
primitives/src/constants.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
primitives/src/market.rs	71.42% <ø> (ø)
.../src/traits/zeitgeist_multi_reservable_currency.rs	53.65% <ø> (ø)
primitives/src/types.rs	3.12% <ø> (ø)
zrml/authorized/src/benchmarks.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
zrml/authorized/src/migrations.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
zrml/authorized/src/mock.rs	37.50% <ø> (ø)
zrml/authorized/src/mock_storage.rs	3.12% <ø> (ø)
zrml/authorized/src/tests.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 54 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[sea212]

Why is Zeitgeist PM LLC. removed here? I some other files such as src/parameters.rs it is kept, in others it's removed. I can't make out a pattern.

[sea212]

Is it because 2022 the change of entities happened? Is it sufficient to only name one in that case?

[maltekliemann]

Is it because 2022 the change of entities happened?

Yes. Forecasting Technologies took over in October 2022, and the asset_registry.rs was created in November of the same year: https://github.com/zeitgeistpm/zeitgeist/commits/0e5af7f33a0445c72e72e0a1a1378c05157dd565/runtime/battery-station/src/xcm_config/asset_registry.rs.

Is it sufficient to only name one in that case?

Seem reasonable to me. Everyone working on this file was employed by Forecasting Technologies. Why would Zeitgeist PM retain a copyright? That being said, I'm making all of this up on the spot using only common sense. If you want to know for sure (including how copyright notices and licenses should be managed), you should ask a lawyer.