Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

addressing issue #132 #137

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Feb 1, 2023
Merged

addressing issue #132 #137

merged 22 commits into from
Feb 1, 2023

Conversation

cmaceves
Copy link
Collaborator

addressing issue #132, allowing both forward and reverse primers to be trimmed from a strand if the primer pair file is passed using the experimental -f flag. issue raised for small insert sizes by a user.

@cmaceves cmaceves marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2022 21:36
@cmaceves
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cmaceves commented Aug 5, 2022

for unpaired data, if a primer pair file is provided, we now use that information to determine which NT's to trim

@khyox
Copy link

khyox commented Sep 30, 2022

Hi Chrissy, thank you so much for working on these important issues! Do you have an estimate of when you will be ready to merge your code changes? Are you thinking of a new version tag after this? Thank you very much!

@cmaceves
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @khyox! We will be looking to bump versions after this merge. Review is still in progress, should be within the next few weeks

@khyox
Copy link

khyox commented Sep 30, 2022

Thank you so much for your reply and for your work on the merge, Chrissy! We will be looking forward to it and the version bump.

@cmaceves cmaceves merged commit 4d65778 into master Feb 1, 2023
@cmaceves cmaceves deleted the issue_132 branch February 1, 2023 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants